Sponsored briefing: Acquisition of properties in Turkey by foreign-capitalised companies

Sponsored briefing: Acquisition of properties in Turkey by foreign-capitalised companies

Starting from the early 2000s, Turkey became increasingly popular in the eyes of foreign investors. By increasing their market share every following year, the real estate investments reached a significant level as a result of such foreign investments, which include different types of investments and investors. Direct investment by acquisition of a property following the incorporation of a company in Turkey; indirect investment by acquisition of shares of a company, which already own a property; or investment by forming of a joint venture with a Turkish company may be regarded as examples of foreign investments in the Turkish real estate market. Similarly, the countries of origin of the investors also diversified throughout the time. Today, in addition to the US and Europe, Turkey welcomes numerous investments from the Gulf Region countries and Far East countries as well.

The main group of investors in the Turkish real estate market include foreign real estate funds/companies; project development companies; investment companies as well as foreign persons who wish to acquire a property in Turkey either for personal use or to obtain Turkish citizenship. The investments may focus on shopping malls, office buildings, residences, or involve construction of hotel projects, entering into partnerships with the owners of completed projects or acquisition of all shares of the same, etc. Furthermore, the investors also prefer to be a part of revenue-sharing agreements or become a partner of the government in construct-operate-transfer1 projects or public private partnership (PPP)2 projects. Continue reading “Sponsored briefing: Acquisition of properties in Turkey by foreign-capitalised companies”

Sponsored briefing: Q&A with partner Egemen Egemenoglu

Sponsored briefing: Q&A with partner Egemen Egemenoglu

1. Given Turkey’s recent economic problems and the problems created by the Covid-19 pandemic, how is this affecting your firm?

We can proudly say that we have successfully surpassed the challenging position that came along with the Covid-19 pandemic in all respectable matters thanks to our comprehensive experience gained throughout the 53 years in which we have provided legal services in Turkey. In these 53 years, our firm had to take innovative and cautious steps in order to tide over many different challenges such as several economic and political crises we have encountered as a country. So, when the first cases of Covid-19 were reported by the officials in Wuhan City, China, in December 2019, we knew that we had to prepare for the worst-case scenario. For this reason, we have accelerated our digitalisation process – thus taking it into a next level even though our digital infrastructure was already at advanced levels. As such, when the first Covid-19 case was announced in Turkey on 10 March 2020, we were already prepared to detach ourselves from our physical offices and started to work from our homes on 15 March 2020 through the decision mutually taken by our partners. Continue reading “Sponsored briefing: Q&A with partner Egemen Egemenoglu”

Sponsored briefing: Changing roles and expectations on the relationship between in-house legal counsels and law firms

Sponsored briefing: Changing roles and expectations on the relationship between in-house legal counsels and law firms

The position of in-house legal counsel has been taking place effectively across the world since the beginning of the ’80s. This position comes forward with the headlines as in-house legal counsel, chief legal counsel (CLO), and head of legal are titles in common use nowadays. As these positions become widespread and with the proliferation of the legal departments in companies, the relationship between the law firms and in-house legal counsel has gained great importance.

The Relationship between In-House Legal Counsel and Law Firms

Taking numerous changes in today’s modern world into consideration, it can be easily said that the roles, perspectives and job descriptions of in-house legal counsel have been altered. Such change along with the various requirements has moved the longstanding relationship between in-house legal counsel and law firms to another dimension.

Let us consider the position that in-house legal counsel have reached. In a globalised world, the points that companies have reached and served have started to spread all over the world rather than a specific region while the growth rate of the companies has increased many times more. With the effect of that, economic environment, the competition dimension, the management perception and the changes on the distribution of tasks ended up with higher expectations from legal counsel such as taking commercial decisions, planning budgets, being aware of technological developments, shortly, working with full business awareness by effecting the in-house legal counsel’s perspective. Under these parameters, the companies offer enormous opportunities to legal counsel for innovation, leadership, and decision making at the highest levels – especially as companies have gone global. One of the most significant roles of in-house legal counsel, who started to have many hats such as risk manager, ethics and compliance officer, administrative official affairs, wise adviser, shows itself as ‘leadership’.

Looking at the last ten years’ in-house counsel positions, the in-house legal counsel had to work with and lead almost all departments within the company, it is an inevitable fact that today’s requirements have moved this figure into a position that conducts risk analysis and leads business decisions, even though we would be picturing a figure whose sole duty is evaluating the legal compliance of the decisions taken by the company and also trying to abstain to direct the commercial decisions. In the light of this reality, we can describe that the relationship and expectations between in-house legal counsel and law firms have evolved and transformed with the usual flow of the process. In order not to block off the flow, law firms are also expected to observe this process and keep up with today’s global and modern developments. The evolution of general counsel is examined through a conversation with the chief legal counsel of one of Turkey’s leading holdings who conveyed his experiences. He has observed this development by working in the same company for many years and witnessed that the profession has changed with the evolution of the opinion of legal view starting from compliance for technological developments well into commercial decisions. That was a great real-life experience.

A Role Comprising Strategy and Leadership

The expanding roles led lawyers to get more into the business world. Rather than evaluating the legal consequences of the commercial decisions taken by the company, law firms – which have the motive of efficiency, value and commercial awareness that shape the relationship between corporate identity and law – were among those preferred to be consulted by in-house legal counsel. Nowadays, the law offices that have a good grasp on the corporate memory of the represented company, are competent in assisting the company to achieve its strategic goals for different locations in a globalising world and which can expand its visions, stand out in this choice.

With the transition of in-house legal counsel from a figure just providing legal advice to a complex role covering strategy and leadership, the expectation that will affect the critical business decisions by providing a legal perspective as ‘more than a lawyer’ also shows itself for the law firms. The most significant reason for the increase of need for law firms are the growing business volume of in-house legal counsel and the expansion of the job description within the company. The emerging role of the law firms can be defined also the lawyers’ lawyer position. It can be easily said that while in-house legal counsel sit in the driver’s seat, the law firms are always ready for the duty as a co-pilot. Therefore, the need for an effective and powerful co-pilot brings out a search for quality.

The in-house legal counsel of a leading international company in the automotive sector, described this search as ‘effective, solution-oriented, fulfilling the requirements in a short time’ during a Legal 500 GC Summit. While ‘time, solution-oriented, correct and feasible answers’ increase preference, law firms, which can use their legal perspective on business-critical decisions within the scope of business strategy of the company, are in the leading role of the evaluated in-house legal counsel-law firm relationship.

Law firms that can use the legal perspective on critical decisions in terms of business within the scope of the company’s business strategy take the lead role of the transformed internal legal adviser-law firm relationship. The key issue is to understand the client’s business needs including its appetite for risk. At this point, the need for lawyers who blend law and commerce, follow up technological, economic and sectoral developments is not negligible. The evolution of the profession has also changed the definition of relationship management between in-house legal counsel and law firms. Being able to keep up with the fast-changing criteria and definitions that emerged in this context made the expanding role of lawyer more business-oriented. Adopting a critical role in managing corporate risk and strategic decisions, lawyers become the bilateral winner of this change and transformation.

For more information, please contact:

Vefa Reşat Moral, managing partner

Moral & Partners
Hakkı Yeten Caddesi Selenium Plaza No: 10C Kat: 16, Fulya, Beşiktaş, İstanbul

T: 0 212 232 35 95
E: info@moral.av.tr

moral.av.tr/en

Turkey focus: Crisis, what crisis?

Turkey focus: Crisis, what crisis?

As Covid-19 continues to wreak havoc, many countries face both an economic and a health crisis. But for Turkey, the concept of crisis is nothing new: it has long been part of everyday life. The current malaise, which predates the pandemic, has its origins in the attempted coup of 2016 and the government’s authoritarian response: over 300 people were killed and 75,000 arrested, including 2,700 judges. Such coups d’état have punctuated Turkey’s historical narrative in every decade since the 1960s. More recently, there was the currency and debt crisis of 2018, which saw the credit rating agencies downgrade Turkey’s debt to junk status.

Notwithstanding these difficulties, President Erdoğan is still firmly in control. Added to the $120bn in infrastructure spending since 2003, new highways and rail links are planned. Turkey’s $730bn economy, the world’s 20th-largest, even managed to expand slightly last year. But problems persist: inflation at 15% and interest rates recently hiked to 19%, while the Turkish Lira’s precipitous decline against the US dollar has sparked an exodus of foreign capital. In an effort to boost tourism, one of the country’s strongest sectors, Turkey announced that it would be the first country to accept British holidaymakers without Covid checks. Despite Erdoğan’s promises to cut inflation in an attempt to restore confidence, sustained turbulence undermines the country’s economic credibility. Continue reading “Turkey focus: Crisis, what crisis?”

Sponsored briefing: Surprise decision ban as a novelty in Turkish labour law

Sponsored briefing: Surprise decision ban as a novelty in Turkish labour law

Yavuz & Uyanik & Akalin’s Murat Uyanik on the importance of the rule of law and the right to legal certainty in Turkish law

Labour Law in Turkey is one of the areas of law in which the most lawsuits are filed and with the highest number of file transfers to the Supreme Court, until the recent launch of the Appeal Courts. This matter is confirmed with the data published by the Ministry of Justice at the end of 2019. According to the relative data, 1,513,943 labour cases were filed between the years 2012 and 2019. According to the aforementioned data, the number of ongoing cases at the end of the year 2019 is 543,692. Upon the multiplying increase in the number of labour cases each year and the Supreme Court’s failure to bear the litigation burden, it has also been observed that the number of chambers coping with labour law disputes has increased to three in the last decade. Continue reading “Sponsored briefing: Surprise decision ban as a novelty in Turkish labour law”

Sponsored briefing: Product Safety And Technical Regulations Law Numbered 7223 and the compensation liability of the manufacturer

Sponsored briefing: Product Safety And Technical Regulations Law Numbered 7223 and the compensation liability of the manufacturer

As part of the European Union harmonisation process, the Turkish parliament has adopted the Product Safety and Technical Regulations Law (the PSTRL). The PSTRL, published on 12 March 2020, has entered into force one year after its publication just recently, on 12 March 2021. Just before the PSTRL entered into force, the General Product Safety Regulation was also published. The provisions regarding PSTRL are prepared considering the European Union Product Liability Directive dated 1985. By the promulgation of PSTRL, which has been expected for a long time and is an important part of the EU harmonisation process, the product liability has been regulated as a whole through a general act of parliament. The doctrine, which was in the expectation of a law that complies with EU regulations, has long advocated the need of regulating the manufacturer’s absolute responsibility not only to the consumers but also to all third parties.

PSTRL’s main purpose is to regulate in detail the requirements in relation to the safety of all kinds of products, and in case of contradiction with such requirements to ensure that the responsible party, such as the manufacturer or importer, provides appropriate compensation for the damages caused by the non-conforming product to the customer’s health or property.

The products that are exported or aimed to be exported to the EU member states are deemed presented to the market within the scope of this law. On the other hand, the products that are exported and planned to be exported to countries other than those within the EU are excluded from scope of PSTRL. Nevertheless, these products must also be safe, not subject to adulteration, and the marking, labelling and certification of the product must be done in a manner that will not mislead the buyer.

The responsible persons from product liability are defined in PSTRL as the manufacturer or importer of the product.

Obviously, not only consumers can be harmed by a product, but non-consumers also need protection as well. Despite this obvious need of a general rule, there is no regulation in law on the Protection of the Consumer and also in the Turkish Code of Obligations regarding the product liability. In fact, PSTRL was adopted as a response to the urgent need of a special regulation of the product liability, and the gap related to this matter under Turkish law. Thus, the standard of the EU that the responsibility of the manufacturer is not only towards the consumers, but against all third parties, has been introduced in Turkey as well.

PSTRL uses the concept of inappropriate product instead of failure or defective product as a condition of the product liability to be triggered. In accordance with the PSTRL, no limitation has been made in the responsibility of the manufacturer, in terms of both personal and property damage, or pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

It was designated in article 21 of the PSTRL how the liability of the manufacturer or importer will be extinguished as well. Since the product is considered safe as a presumption pursuant to PSTRL article 5, the manufacturer or importer can avoid responsibility by proving the product’s compliance with the technical requirements regarding human health and safety. So the manufacturer or importer companies should prepare their set of arguments towards potential claims, that has to be based on the ‘compliance with technical requirements’.

In addition to the above, there are other remarkable novelties in PSTRL that especially aim to ensure the safety of consumers including in e-commerce. Pursuant to article 17 of PSTRL, access to the web pages that sell or advertise inappropriate products will be denied. Furthermore, in order to maintain transparent background for the consumers, the names of all of the persons in the supply chain will be recorded. This traceability will also provide an opportunity to prevent informal economy. Once a product is detected to be inappropriate, these products will be recalled from the market and this will provide the safety of the consumers.

The spectrum of the PSTRL is so broad that, the companies that are no party to any contract with the damaged person, such as car manufacturers, durable goods manufacturers, spare parts manufacturers, etc. would be legally responsible without question. In some cases insurance companies may request their recourse claims that have resulted from adulterated goods, from manufacturers or importers. Therefore global manufacturing companies and their importer affiliates may face direct claims from Turkey within the scope of the PSTRL. We hope that with PSTRL, the safe economic conditions for both national and foreign investors globally will be established and not only consumers, but also everyone who suffer from the hazardous effects of inappropriate products will be protected.

For more information, please contact:

Mehmet Selim Yavuz

Yavuz & Uyanik & Akalin
Etiler Mahallesi Tepecik Yolu No:82 Dalmaz Konut Apt. K:3 D:5 34337 Etiler, Beşiktaş

T: +90 212 351 30 50
E: info@yavuz-uyanik.av.tr

www.yualaw.com

Sponsored briefing: Is Turkey’s first regulation on crypto-assets just a beginning?

Sponsored briefing: Is Turkey’s first regulation on crypto-assets just a beginning?

Although it remains unclear whether cryptocurrencies will replace traditional money in the near future or ever, they have become a global phenomenon lately. Likewise, the economic turbulence in Turkey has led to a surge in swapping the local currency for cryptocurrencies despite their price volatility. According to a recent survey, Turkey has the fourth-highest rate of cryptocurrency use out of 74 countries1.

Background of Recent Developments

With the growing popularity of the crypto market in Turkey, the government’s concerns about using cryptocurrencies for illegitimate activities such as money laundering, terrorist financing, and tax evasion have gradually increased. As a response to all these matters, the signals of the legislative framework for the crypto-assets have been given under Turkey’s 11th Development Plan2. Turkey’s economic roadmap also unveils that the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey shall foster the financial, technologic, and legal infrastructure of digital money by the end of this year3. Continue reading “Sponsored briefing: Is Turkey’s first regulation on crypto-assets just a beginning?”

Sponsored briefing: Recent arbitration developments in Turkey

Sponsored briefing: Recent arbitration developments in Turkey

Turkey has been experiencing an upward trend in both international and domestic arbitration especially in the last decade as the practitioners have become more experienced, scholars have been more active in addressing controversial issues and most importantly the case law was significantly developed in the arbitration-related matters.

Pro-arbitration stance of Turkish courts

Barring a few controversial decisions, it would be fair to say that in recent years, the arbitration-related matters dealt by the Turkish courts have become much more sophisticated and the courts have solidified their stance regarding the essential matters of arbitration by rendering arbitration-friendly decisions. There have been several decisions where the courts have applied the principles of separability and prohibition of révision au fond more strictly and without hesitation. Continue reading “Sponsored briefing: Recent arbitration developments in Turkey”

Sponsored briefing: Q&A – Serdar Paksoy

Sponsored briefing: Q&A – Serdar Paksoy

1. Given Turkey’s recent economic problems, how is this affecting your clients and how can you help mitigate the risks?

Turkey has been going through a period of economic uncertainty since the summer of 2018, when a number of factors led to a sharp devaluation of the Turkish lira against major foreign currencies and a surge in inflation. These volatile economic conditions have affected Turkish companies’ profits as well as their ability to serve their foreign currency debt, resulting in the need for debt restructuring and corporate divestments, especially within large conglomerates. This also led to the issuance of legislation to protect the currency, imposing that certain contracts be denominated in Turkish lira or delimiting the circumstances in which Turkish companies can borrow in foreign currency. The ambitious economic agenda of the Turkish government, however, is expected to put Turkey back on a path of sustainable growth.

We help our clients adapt to the new environment by overhauling their contracts and credit arrangements in order to comply with the new legislation. When acting for foreign players looking to invest in Turkey, we advise on adequate provisions in the transaction documents meant to anticipate the impact volatile economic conditions could have on the agreed deal terms. These may address a variety of issues, such as currency fluctuations between signing and closing, the target’s need for recapitalisation to remain in line with statutory equity ratios, or the necessity to redesign the target’s debt structure.

The current conditions in Turkey also bring significant opportunities for those foreign investors who continue to see the country’s mid-to-long-term business case, with a sizeable growth potential compared to more developed countries in many yet-underpenetrated sectors of the economy. Given Turkey’s history of economic downturns followed by spectacular rebounds, some investment advisers also see the current period as offering attractive valuations for buyers with the prospect of sizeable returns when the market recovers.

2. How has this affected the flow of foreign direct investment, the volume of deals and dispute resolution?

The current economic climate has led foreign investors to be more cautious with their investment plans and the factors upon which they build their business case. We see a significant slowdown in PE investment, since the current market conditions will often not match their pre-defined investment criteria. Strategic investors, on the other hand, continue to see the country’s opportunities, all the more so when it comes to target companies with sales skewed towards exports, which benefit from higher revenue against lower costs as a result of the currency devaluation. Restructuring plans within major Turkish conglomerates can also put on the market potentially attractive targets, which would not otherwise have gone up for sale.

Investors will, however, proceed with caution. Combined with the fact that sellers’ price expectations can initially remain relatively high, this results in longer transaction processes compared to previous years, with negotiations sometimes dragging on for months or being halted several times before the parties finally reach an agreement.

‘The ambitious economic agenda of the Turkish government is expected to put Turkey back on a path of sustainable growth.’

3. Which practice areas are the biggest originators of work and why?

Corporate/M&A and dispute resolution remain the biggest originators of work, with M&A in particular holding itself at a fairly satisfactory level in view of current market uncertainties, as the practice is fed by large divestments and strategic opportunities. We do, however, see significant growth in debt restructuring and insolvency, compliance and investigations, as well as banking and finance work, all of which are driven by the impact of current economic conditions and the market players’ increased caution when proceeding with investments.

4. Do you anticipate a resurgence in infrastructure/project finance?

Although there has been a slowdown in infrastructure project tenders initiated by the government, we expect new tenders to be launched in the transport, healthcare and education sectors in the coming years. Some of these transactions will require sizeable project financing. Turkey has also set itself ambitious renewable energy utilisation targets, which will boost project finance activities in the country.

5. As a global downturn is increasingly possible, how well are Turkish companies positioned?

The Turkish economy remains strongly dependent on exports and foreign direct investment and the country would undoubtedly be affected by a global downturn. The previous major downturn in 2008 had shown that while Turkey’s banking system was at the time comparatively more robust than in Western economies due to strong capitalisation rules, the country was eventually affected by the crisis when the slowdown in its major export markets reverberated on the real economy.

Although the present situation may be riskier, with Turkey’s banking system already under tension due to the recent currency crisis, the Turkish economy’s resilience is noteworthy. Turkish companies may still benefit from a competitive advantage with a young, skilled and affordable workforce, and the growing ability they have demonstrated in recent years to export their strengths and know-how to new markets, such as African countries for the construction sector, and hedge their exposure to the local economy with investments abroad.

6. The Turkish central bank’s drive to reboot growth, slashing benchmark rates by 7.5%, and offering incentives for banks to offer credit – what impact is that having in bank advisory work?

Considering the liquidity of Turkish banks, we expect the lower interest rates to promote growth in the Turkish lending market across all segments, including retail and wholesale. The lower interest rates will also promote the refinancing market, especially in infrastructure projects. This being said, the lending landscape in Turkey is already quite busy with ECA [export credit agency] loans, trade finance, IFI [international financial institution] loans, sovereign borrowings and FI transactions.

7. Which sectors are of most interest to M&A/private equity investors?

Investors continue to be consistently attracted to the industrial and consumer goods sectors, as well as transportation and logistics. We also see foreign players increasingly seeking opportunities to invest in Turkish companies with a focus on emerging technologies, especially payment systems and communications technology, and believe this will be a key area of investment in upcoming years. Finally, there have been high-value entries in the Turkish financial sector from Middle East corporate groups, as well as some opportunities in the insurance sector, where a number of sizeable bancassurance arrangements will come up for renegotiation or new tender in upcoming years.

‘We see foreign players increasingly seeking opportunities to invest in Turkish companies with a focus on emerging technologies.’

8. As the Turkish energy sector is being rapidly reshaped, what opportunities does this provide?

Turkey is keen to bring a significant increase in its use of renewable energy in the coming years. These efforts will particularly materialise in the wind sector. The government is expected to announce a number of renewable energy resource zone tenders in the near future. These tenders should be smaller in size than the previous ones, meaning that the Turkish energy sector will offer more opportunities to a diversified group of investors.

9. What impact is there for Turkish companies complying with global regulations and new national regulations, eg the Turkish Data Protection Law, modelled on GDPR?

Given the significance of foreign investment in Turkey, many Turkish companies are well acquainted with the need to comply with global regulations, be it in the field of anti-bribery and corruption (especially FCPA [Foreign Corrupt Practices Act]/UKBA [UK Bribery Act]), international sanctions, data protection, corporate governance or financial reporting standards. Turkish companies with a foreign shareholder, or even a major foreign supplier, will often already apply global compliance standards in a number of areas.

The ongoing harmonisation of Turkish legislation with global regulatory standards is largely supported by the government as a tool to make the country an ever-more attractive destination for foreign investment and is generally welcome by local companies with the ambition to attract new investors despite the added burden on their internal processes.

The Turkish Data Protection Law provides a good example of this trend. Introduced in 2016, the new piece of legislation replaced hitherto scattered and little-enforced privacy regulations with a full-fledged data protection regime, giving companies two years to audit their data processing practices – in many cases for the very first time – and put them in compliance with the new law. This called for an abrupt change in culture, but as in most emerging markets corporates have been quick to adapt. While the legislator had deliberately opted to mirror the Turkish Data Protection Law on the 1995 EU Directive, rather than GDPR, in order to soften the impact of the new regime, we see that many Turkish companies have chosen to transition directly to the higher GDPR standards in order to boost their ability to do business on the international stage.

For more information, please contact:

Serdar Paksoy, managing and senior partner

Paksoy
Orjin Maslak
Eski Büyükdere Caddesi
No:27 K:11 Maslak 34485
Istanbul
Turkey

T: +90 212 366 4757
E: spaksoy@paksoy.av.tr

www.paksoy.av.tr

Paksoy