‘A weaker moral compass’: Study reveals one in five law students would falsify time records

More than one in five law students surveyed in the UK and the US admit they would falsify time records for personal and business gain, according to the first cross-jurisdiction quantitative study of the ethics of law students published in the International Journal of the Legal Profession earlier this month. Continue reading “‘A weaker moral compass’: Study reveals one in five law students would falsify time records”

SRA pushes ahead with super-exam proposals with second consultation

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is pushing on with its ‘super exam’ proposals, launching another consultation following mixed feedback on the education reforms. However it said yesterday (3 October) it would delay implementation another year as it develops its plans.

Continue reading “SRA pushes ahead with super-exam proposals with second consultation”

Comment: Picking up the New Law gauntlet – CC’s City head calls for a new approach to training the lawyers of the future

New entrants to the legal profession will be competing head on against Kim, the virtual assistant from Riverview Law, and Ross, IBM Watson’s ‘super-intelligent’ attorney, in delivering services to clients. Ross, unlike most of us, has the ability to research every resource of legal knowledge in seconds, and, even more impressive to the older ones among us, remember it.

Continue reading “Comment: Picking up the New Law gauntlet – CC’s City head calls for a new approach to training the lawyers of the future”

Comment: Time to move on – Savage argues legal education is falling behind the realities of the profession

Let’s get this in context right off the bat. The Training for Tomorrow proposals by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) represent the most radical change in legal education for over 20 years. When one considers the massive structural changes in the legal services market in recent years, which have been covered extensively by Legal Business before, we are faced with a unique situation.

Continue reading “Comment: Time to move on – Savage argues legal education is falling behind the realities of the profession”

It’s high time we moved on – why legal education fails the key test

Nigel Savage argues that legal education is falling further behind the realities of the industry

Let’s get this in context right off the bat. The Training for Tomorrow proposals by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) represent the most radical change in legal education for over 20 years. When one considers the massive structural changes in the legal services market in recent years, which have been covered extensively in these pages before, we are faced with a unique situation. The legal services sector has moved on and is tackling fundamental issues provoked by a combination of market forces, regulatory changes and the impact of technology. The SRA needs to reflect that environment within the new test of knowledge and competence (the mooted Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), which is billed as a means of raising professional standards and allowing more flexible routes to qualification). It is, however, constrained by the contradiction of a regulatory framework based as much on historic and largely outdated concepts of ‘reserved’ activity and the reality that a huge proportion of the work that takes place in the market (particularly the City) is not reserved and therefore doesn’t require solicitor status. Even where it is reserved, others can often deliver it at a much lower cost.

Continue reading “It’s high time we moved on – why legal education fails the key test”