Kirkland & Ellis surges ahead as revenue hits $8.8bn and PEP jumps 16%

Kirkland & Ellis wrecking ball

Kirkland & Ellis put its topline turnover up by 22% to a total of $8.8bn – an increase of $1.6bn on the $7.2bn the firm posted last year, and more than double last year’s annual growth rate of 10%.

Profit per equity partner (PEP) was also up by more than 16%, to $9.25m from just under $8m last year, with revenue per lawyer (RPL) up more than 12% to $2.3m from just over $2m last year.

The firm achieved these increases while ending 2024 with higher numbers of equity partners, non-equity partners, and total lawyers – up more than 6% to 573, up nearly 14% to 1,103, and up 9% to 3,828 respectively.

The bump to profitability was evident across other metrics, with average compensation for all lawyers up 11% to $3.7m, and net income to equity partners up nearly 24% to over $5.3bn.

The revenue increase means that Kirkland has more than doubled its turnover in the last five years, up nearly 112% from the $4.15bn reported in 2020’s Global 100 table.

Kirkland continued to expand around the world in 2024, building on its 2023 Riyadh launch with the opening of a new office in Frankfurt last summer, its 20th overall and its second in Germany. The office was established with the hire of Latham corporate department regional chair Tobias Larisch, and now has a total of five partners, as well as eight associates.

The firm continued to build momentum into 2025, opening in Philadelphia with the hire of Skadden litigator and trial lawyer Allison Brown, who joined alongside fellow litigation partners Jessica Davidson and Christopher Cox in New York and Geoffrey Wyatt and Nina Rose in Washington DC.

After a series of high-profile departures to Paul Weiss in London that began in summer 2023, Kirkland also overhauled its exit terms last year, introducing the ability to withhold accrued compensation from departing partners, reducing the notice period for exiting partners from 120 days to 60, and cutting the time leavers will have to wait for capital to be repaid from 12 months to three.

alexander.ryan@legalbusiness.co.uk

Revolving Doors: Paul Hastings lands Kirkland M&A heavyweight as Clifford Chance adds laterals in New York

New York City, US, cityscape

Leading this week’s high-profile moves, Paul Hastings strengthened its corporate M&A practice with the hire of Eric Schiele from Kirkland & Ellis in New York. Schiele, who joins as global co-chair of M&A, brings extensive expertise in big-ticket M&A and public company board and special committee advisory work.

‘Eric is one of the most respected and accomplished M&A attorneys in the US and globally. His addition marks a major leap forward in strengthening our public company M&A platform,’ said firm chair Frank Lopez in a statement.

Also in the Big Apple, Clifford Chance expanded its global financial markets team with the addition of Joanna Nicholas as a partner, enhancing the firm’s collateralized loan obligations (CLO) capabilities in the US. Nicholas arrives from Mayer Brown, bringing over two decades of experience advising collateral managers, arrangers, and investors on new issue CLOs, resets, refinancings, and complex financings.

The firm also added Bryan Luchs as a partner to its corporate M&A practice in New York. Previously at White & Case for 12 years, Luchs has nearly 30 years’ experience advising acquirers, targets, boards of directors, and investment banks on complex domestic and cross-border deals.

This news comes after partner Gianluca Bacchiocchi rejoined Clifford Chance earlier this month, returning to the firm’s global financial markets team following a four-year stint at Latham.

In London, Proskauer hired restructuring and special situations partner Clare Cottle from Akin. Cottle’s practice covers cross-border and domestic financial restructurings, special situations funding, and complex direct loans.

‘Clare’s expertise aligns perfectly with our strategic vision to own the life cycle of private credit. Her proven track record will be invaluable in driving opportunities in restructuring and special situations financing work,’ said firm chair Tim Mungovan in a statement.

Cottle’s arrival follows a series of finance hires at Proskauer, including Philip Bowden and Megan Lawrence in July, and Jake Keaveny and Courtland Tisdale in September last year.

Fried Frank hired Sidley Austin UK tax practice head Oliver Currall as a partner in its London office. With experience advising across UK and international tax structuring, Currall, who also served as co-head of Sidley’s European tax group, makes the move after nine years at Sidley, which he joined in 2016 after making partner at Kirkland in 2014.

Meanwhile, Gibson Dunn bolstered its real estate practice group with the addition of Mark Manson-Bahr. Previously global head of real estate finance at A&O Shearman, Manson-Bahr advises senior bank and mezzanine investment bank clients on investment and development real estate finance transactions across all asset classes in Europe.

This follows other recent laterals for Gibson Dunn’s City office, including Sullivan & Cromwell finance and restructuring duo Presley Warner and Chris Howard last month.

Elsewhere in real estate, Cripps expanded its commercial real estate team with the hire of Adam Carney from Pinsent Masons in London. Carnet, who led Pinsents’ repurposing and retrofitting group, has extensive experience in high-value and complex development, investment, and asset management transactions, aligning with Cripps’ focus on sustainable projects and future-proofing real estate portfolios.

Clyde & Co added to its white-collar crime and sanctions team with the hire of Sam Tate as global head of regulatory and investigations. Tate joins from RPC, where he was global head of white-collar crime and compliance and co-head of the firm’s Middle East operations. His expertise spans financial crime investigations, regulatory matters, and crisis management, particularly in the infrastructure, energy, and technology sectors.

He joins alongside Toby Lamarque, Robert Semp, and Osama Al Jayousi, who move from RPC as senior associate, associate, and consultant, respectively.

Further afield, Norton Rose Fulbright expanded its banking and finance team in Hong Kong with the hire of debt capital markets partner Jessica Li from Ashurst. Li brings experience advising Chinese and international financial institutions, as well as corporate entities, on debt capital markets transactions in the Greater China region.

Jones Day was also active in Hong Kong, hiring corporate partner Frank Voon from K&L Gates.

In Paris, Ropes & Gray launched a new office with the hire of a three-partner team from Clifford Chance: private equity partner Fabrice Cohen will join as office managing partner alongside acquisition finance expert Thierry Arachtingi and private capital transactions specialist Emmanuel Mimin. They are joined by a team of counsel and associates, bringing experience in private equity, infrastructure, banking, and finance transactions.

‘Ropes & Gray is a global leader in private capital and strategic M&A,’ said Cohen in a statement. ‘We look forward to building upon the firm’s first-class reputation across some of the currently most active sectors in private capital and strategic M&A, such as healthcare and life sciences, technology, infrastructure, and more.’

anna.huntley@legalease.co.uk

Travers to launch new base in Brussels alongside Paris wind-down

Travers Smith is opening a new base in Brussels in a rare instance of international expansion for the City firm.

The new office, which is set to open in April this year, will become the London firm’s only other international base, with the launch coming alongside the closure of its Paris office, which has been in operation since 1999.

In a statement, the firm said there will be no redundancies and that all staff currently working in Paris ‘will be treated as part of the firm’s London office’.

The new Brussels base will be led by the firm’s head of competition Stephen Whitfield and partner Nigel Seay – who previously led the competition practice before being succeeded by Whitfield in July last year.

Whitfield has been at Travers for 14 years, joining from Taylor Wessing in 2011 and making partner in 2016, while Seay has been at the firm since 2006, when he joined from Linklaters, before making partner a year later.

The duo will divide their time between Brussels and London, supported by the firm’s London-based competition bench. The firm is not set to make any additional hires for the opening, but expects to consider expansion in future.

The opening is an extremely uncommon instance of international expansion for Travers, a firm with a long-held strategy of focusing its efforts on its main London office. The firm’s former managing partner, David Patient, told LB in a 2019 interview that ‘the decision not to plant flags around the globe is part of our success.’

However, an on-the-ground presence in Brussels is seen as increasingly vital for firms with a strong competition practice. Other firms to have launched there recently include Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison,  which followed up its English law launch in 2023 with a move into Brussels last year.

Meanwhile, Slaughter and May and Macfarlanes, the firms most commonly mentioned alongside Travers due to their similar international approaches, both have outposts in Brussels. Slaughters has been in Brussels since 2007, while Macfarlanes opened a base there in 2017 after poaching a three-strong competition team from King & Wood Mallesons.

The international expansion marks a busy March for Travers. The firm has recently welcomed funds specialist John Daghlian, a former O’Melveny and Akin partner who has come on board as a senior consultant to the asset management group; as well as Jeremy Dennison, who is returning to the firm as a partner in the private equity and financial sponsors group, following a seven-year stint as general counsel at mid-market private equity firm Livingbridge.

Dennision had previously spent five years as an associate at the firm and almost three years as a senior associate in two separate stints between 2007 and 2018.

Travers has been through a period of upheaval in recent years, with 17 partners departing during 2023 and 2024, although the firm’s most recent financial results saw the firm break the £200m barrier for the first time, with profit per equity partner increasing by 18% from £1.07m to £1.3m.

Managing partner Edmund Reed, whose second three-year term as managing partner begins in July this year, acknowledged the recent disruption in an interview with LB last year, but expressed confidence in the firm’s future direction, asserting that ‘external noise had calmed down’ and that the firm’s partners were ‘aligned and pushing together’.

The firm is also set to move into new London offices in Stonecutter Court in early 2026.

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk

Reed Smith breaks $1.5bn for the first time as London revenue grows by 15%

Reed Smith has hit a key milestone as global revenue hit $1.5bn, up just over 5% from last year’s figure of $1.43bn. PEP, meanwhile, increased by nearly 14% to $1.8m from $1.6m.

London, the firm’s largest office, enjoyed a stellar year with revenue up more than 15% to $247m, while revenue per lawyer surged nearly 30% to $946,720.

The uptick in London revenue represented a turnaround from last year’s 6% drop from $228.8m in 2022 to $214.4m in 2023.

The firm puts the London growth down to strategic investments in areas including private equity, corporate, finance and energy in 2023 and 2024. Gregor Pryor, Reed Smith’s Europe and Middle East managing partner also believes the firm’s move to a new London office in Blossom Yard (pictured) in early 2024 has had a positive effect.

‘We were well placed to capitalise on the uptick in deal activity in the second half of 2024,’ Pryor said in a statement. ‘Our London office’s recent move to Blossom Yard, coupled with our strategic focus on driving activity in our corporate and private equity practices through our industry strengths, brought renewed energy to the office.’

London hires in 2023 and 2024 include private credit partner Linn Mayhew, who joined in 2023 from McGuireWoods, and private equity partner Tom Whelan,  and energy partner Nina Howell, who joined in 2024 from McDermott Will & Emery and King & Spalding, respectively.

Reed Smith’s financial industry group led the firm’s industry groups in revenue, while its insurance recovery, litigation, managed care, entertainment and media, and bankruptcy/restructuring practice also enjoyed strong years.

‘Our clients are turning to us for complex, high-value work, and we’ve expanded the range of services we provide to meet their evolving business needs,’  said Casey Ryan, Reed Smith’s global managing partner. ‘We are building on the success of 2024 and have continued the momentum, recently opening offices in Atlanta and Denver.’

The firm’s headcount was down nearly 6% year-on-year, to 1,432 this year from 1,516 last year. The number of equity partners also decreased, to 270 from 276.

In 2025, however, the firm has already added 28 new partners around the world, with 26 in its new US offices in Atlanta and Denver. The remaining two additions are London equity capital markets partner Samantha Myers, who joined from Gowling WLG, and Washington DC finance partner Chris Buchanan, who joined from King & Spalding.

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk

Finding the right fit: the duo behind Davis Polk’s long-awaited London restructuring launch

With just 12 partners in London, Davis Polk’s approach to recruitment in the capital has been conservative to say the least. 

Until last year, the US firm had not made a London lateral hire since 2013. However, that all changed in 2024 with the additions of A&O Shearman private equity partner Gordon Milne and Luke McDougall, the former global co-head of finance at Paul Hastings.

Those hires, which were prompted by the acknowledgement of a need to scale up in London, were quickly followed by Sidley restructuring duo Mark Knight and Jifree Cader, who have joined to launch a new City offering for the firm.

For more, see ‘With an open checkbook, they’ll likely target top talent’ – Davis Polk London scale-up turns heads

The duo, who now co-head the European restructuring practice, told LB that the opportunity to build a practice from the ground up in London – in tandem with the firm’s top-tier US practice – was too good to turn down.   

‘This was a fantastic opportunity to launch a restructuring practice at an elite firm, and for us, this is the right move,’ says Knight. 

Cader and Knight joined Sidley in 2016 and 2019 respectively, after having previously worked together at Kirkland & Ellis. Before moving to Sidley, Knight also spent almost two years as general counsel at KKR-backed investment firm Pillarstone.   

‘While we had already built a practice together at Sidley, we feel we could build something even better at Davis Polk,’ adds Cader. ‘It was one of the last top-tier US law firms that hadn’t yet made a major entry into restructuring in London, which made it very attractive to us.’ 

It is understood that five Sidley associates are set to join Knight and Cader at Davis Polk, with one making the move up to counsel. 

The duo, who are both recognised as Legal 500 leading partners for restructuring, represent private equity firms, hedge funds, and other distressed debt and par investors. In 2023, they won the Restructuring Team of the Year award at the Legal Business Awards for their role advising China Fortune Land on the $4.96bn restructuring of offshore debt through an English scheme of arrangement. 

On the rationale for the move, market observers note that while Davis Polk’s restructuring practice has traditionally been more lender focused, Knight and Cader have had notable success with debtor side mandates in recent years,  advising Chinese real estate developer Sino Ocean on its English restructuring plan and Hong Kong scheme of arrangement, as well as acting for Sunac China Holdings on its $10.2bn offshore debt restructuring. 

Knight elaborates: ‘We’ve always had a diversified business, covering all the key stakeholders in a restructuring context, including senior and junior creditors, sponsors, strategics, as well as acting for debtors.

‘The balance of our practice has shifted year on year to match the evolving restructuring landscape and the opportunities that arose in the market and across the platform,’ he adds, while also noting that a number of their clients were already Davis Polk clients too. 

And Cader is bullish on their prospects for success. ‘Davis Polk launching a restructuring practice in London will be a major disruptive event,’ he predicts. ‘As we build and scale up, our goal is to drive that disruption and deliver on our ambitions.’ 

Views from the market are also largely positive, with Freddie Lawson, head of partner search at Montresor Legal, describing the pair as ‘the real deal’.

‘It’s a super impressive hire by Davis Polk,’ Lawson continues. ‘There’s a generational shift in the restructuring market, and Davis Polk have managed to land two guys who are the future.’ 

Finding the right fit 

The firm’s tier 1 US restructuring practice, which is led from New York by global co-heads Marshall Huebner and Damian Schaible, now comprises 13 partners, with the addition of Knight and Cader bringing global lawyer count to 80. 

Schaible told LB that discussions about expanding the restructuring team in London started roughly five years ago. 

A few years ago we went on a listening tour, speaking with our clients and contacts in London about their needs in European restructuring, and speaking with our partners in London to really understand the market,’ he says. ‘I probably flew back and forth 10 times over the past few years – we wanted to get it right.’   

While a considered recruitment policy is to be applauded, some in the market have questioned why the firm has taken longer than most US peers to make a move into the European restructuring scene, despite launching an English law practice over 13 years ago. 

Davis Polk could have launched their restructuring practice years ago – they had the backing and could have attracted plenty of key players,’ comments one London restructuring head at another US firm. ‘However, I think they were focused on finding the right fit, and they’ve found that in Jifree and Mark.’  

As Schaible explains, the hires of Knight and Cader will complement the firm’s other recent London laterals, who have joined a team led by Europe head and City M&A chief Will Pearce. With the latest additions, overall headcount in London is now up by over 25% on this time last year to move above 60. 

‘We already had a fantastic group of corporate lawyers in London – which is critical to a successful restructuring practice,’ Schaible asserts. ‘With the firm’s broad commitment to making significant additional investments in our London platform, particularly in finance and PE, this was the right time to launch our European practice.’ 

elisha.juttla@legalease.co.uk

International roundup: White & Case hits Weil for three-partner New York team while Reed Smith opens in Denver

New York City cityscape

Leading a busy week for high-profile moves in New York, White & Case raided Weil for a three-partner litigation team formed of Weil’s global co-head of litigation Jonathan Polkes, Stacy Nettleton, and Adam Banks.

Polkes is a first-chair trial lawyer, former federal prosecutor, with experience in high-profile securities, corporate and white collar disputes. He joins after 20 years at Weil.

Weil also saw the departure of its US patent litigation and life sciences head Edward Reines, who moved to Jones Day alongside IP litigator Derek Walter. Reines will be based in Silicon Valley, while Walter will be based in San Francisco.

‘Ed and Derek are extremely talented lawyers with a long list of achievements in high-stakes patent disputes in both jury and bench trials,’ said Anthony Insogna, leader of Jones Day’s intellectual property practice in a statement.

Back in New York, Gianluca Bacchiocchi rejoined Clifford Chance as a member of its global financial markets team following four years at Latham. Bacchiocchi brings nearly 27 years of experience representing sponsors, borrowers, lenders, issuers and underwriters in energy and infrastructure sector financings.

Linklaters hired M&A partner Vinita Sithipathy, who spent ten years at Freshfields before joining Mayer Brown as a partner last September. Her move marks the magic circle firm’s second major move in New York this year, following its hire of a four-partner litigation team in January.

Linklaters also made a major play on the transactional side with its January 2024 hire of a six-lawyer M&A team from legacy Shearman & Sterling led by former Shearman global managing partner George Casey.

Finally in New York, disputes boutique Pallas Partners hired a three-lawyer litigation team from Kasowitz Benson Torres. Partner Michael Hanin leads the team, which also includes partner Jill Forster and associate Andrew Breland. The hires bring  Pallas’s New York partner headcount to five, according to the firm’s website.

In Palo Alto, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett tapped Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati intellectual property trial partner Amy Candido, who joins as head of the firm’s intellectual property litigation practice and a member of the firm’s complex commercial litigation and crisis management groups.

Candido has experience litigating trade secret, patent, copyright, and other IP and data protection cases on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants. She makes the switch after three and a half years at Wilson Sonsini, following a 16-year stint at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and eight years as an associate at Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

Elsewhere in the US, Reed Smith announced the opening of an office in Denver with 20 lawyers – 11 partners, three counsel, and six associates. The new office is the firm’s 20th in the United States and comes hot on the heels of the launch of its Atlanta office in January with a 15-partner team.

The office will be led by finance partner Jay Spader, who joins Reed Smith from US national firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, with corporate partners Brendan Leanos, Jason Larkin, and Chris Hand. Also joining the new office are emerging technologies partner Tyler Thompson from Greenberg Traurig; litigation partners Adam Massaro and Joyce Williams from Akerman; insurance recovery partners Chris Mosley and Brooke Yates from Foley Hoag; and real estate partner Camille Bacon-Schulte from Dentons. They will be joined at the new office by four current Reed Smith lawyers, including partner James Martin.

‘Our clients are enthusiastic about our presence in Denver. Like Atlanta, Denver is a vibrant, fast-growing market. This expansion is aligned with our growth strategy and builds on the strength and experience of our private equity, finance and technology teams,” said Casey Ryan, Reed Smith’s global managing partner in a statement.

Gunnercooke also strengthened its US footprint by opening a Chicago office with a five-partner team from FisherBroyles. The additions of partners Andrew Geier, Nicholas Isaacson, Kelley Smith, Randall Schwartz, and Shannon Geier will bolster the firm’s corporate, private equity, funds, finance, and transactional capabilities. The firm previously expanded into the US with a New York base in 2022.

In Hong Kong, Jones Day augmented its capital markets offering in Hong Kong with the appointment of Kirkland partner Ming Kong. He arrives after three years at Kirkland, having previously spent eight years as an associate at Skadden.

Kirkland’s Hong Kong office has seen a raft of recent departures, with partners Wang Shinong, Paul Quinn, and Gary Li all moving in 2025, to DLA, Herbert Smith Freehills, and Zhong Lun respectively.

In Paris, King & Spalding hired Vivien & Associés restructuring and insolvency proceedings department leader Laurent Assaya as a partner in its finance and restructuring practice group.

Finally, Bird & Bird expanded in Stockholm with the hire of patent litigator Wendela Hårdemark from Swedish IP boutique Westerberg & Partners.

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk

‘Define “having it all” on your own terms’ – White & Case’s Sonica Tolani on thriving in City law

For International Women’s Day, Sonica Tolani, an M&A partner at White & Case in London, discusses the importance of having open discussions and why invisible barriers still exist for women in law.

What do you most enjoy about practising law and M&A law specifically? 

I enjoy the collaborative nature of the work. It’s incredibly rewarding to bring together a diverse group of specialists to tackle complex transactions. Each deal is unique, presenting fresh challenges that keep the work intellectually stimulating. 

I also value the opportunity to build meaningful relationships. Working closely with associates, partners and, especially, clients allow us to truly understand their businesses and strategic objectives. There’s a great deal of satisfaction in crafting creative solutions that balance competing stakeholder interests. 

The energy and pace of deal environments is invigorating. It’s challenging, but when a deal is successful, it’s deeply rewarding. And there’s nothing quite like the feeling when clients want to work with you again on future deals. 

What’s been your most memorable deal and why? 

The US$8.6bn cross-border merger between Avast and Norton. This transaction stands out as a career-defining moment for me. 

One of the reasons it was so memorable is that I navigated its complexity while pregnant with my second child, which presented both personal and professional challenges. The deal required harmonising different regulatory frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, which was no small feat. 

Working with an exceptional team under intense pressure helped forge lasting professional relationships. Successfully closing the transaction shortly before going on maternity leave made it an even more significant milestone, marking a pivotal point in both my career and personal life. 

What’s been your toughest professional moment and what did you learn from it? 

Learning to balance work and motherhood after having my children was a challenging transition and I often had to remind myself that I wasn’t failing and that it was perfectly fine to lean on others for support. 

One key lesson I learned during this time is the importance of putting your hand up and asking for help. It’s crucial to recognise that you don’t have to do everything on your own. I also realised that we can be our own worst critics, often assuming we’re not doing enough when, in reality, we are managing more than we give ourselves credit for. 

What are the top three skills you need to succeed in M&A law? 

Effective communication is crucial because you need to synthesise advice across various practice areas and present it coherently to clients. Being able to convey complex information in an understandable way is key. 

Strategic time management is another essential skill. On a micro level, this means demonstrating cost consciousness, while on a macro level it involves maintaining crucial deal momentum. Balancing these aspects ensures that the transaction progresses smoothly. 

Lastly, risk anticipation and mitigation are vital. It’s important to look beyond immediate legal issues to understand the broader commercial implications and prepare clients for potential roadblocks before they become problems. This proactive approach helps in navigating the complexities of M&A transactions effectively. 

How much progress has been made for women in law since you started your career? 

Since I started my career, there has been significant progress for women in law, marked by both tangible metrics and cultural shifts. For example, nearly 50% of the White & Case lawyers promoted to partner in London over the past five years have been women, and White & Case elected its first female chair in 2023. These milestones reflect a growing recognition of women’s contributions at the highest levels. 

Culturally, I’ve noticed more inclusive practices that accommodate family commitments whenever possible. There’s also greater recognition of diverse career paths, which helps in fostering an inclusive environment. 

However, progress varies across the profession.  It’s important to note that these advances haven’t happened automatically; they’ve often begun with frank conversations and require continuous attention to maintain and build upon the progress made. 

What still needs to improve and what’s holding it back? 

There are still areas that need improvement. One key area is the need for more nuanced support systems that address the different challenges women face at various stages of their careers. 

Women often hesitate to voice their concerns for fear of being labelled ‘difficult’ or less committed. This hesitation can prevent important issues from being addressed. 

Too many assumptions are made about what women lawyers need instead of directly asking them. Engaging in open dialogue is crucial to understanding and meeting their actual needs. 

Another challenge is the persistence of formal and informal systems that reward traditional work patterns, which can create invisible barriers. For example, industry-wide expectations around long hours in the office or the perception that being constantly available equates to commitment can disadvantage those with family or other outside commitments. These systems need to evolve to recognise and reward different ways of working that are equally effective. 

What advice do you have for aspiring young female lawyers who want to get to where you are? 

Start by defining ‘having it all’ on your own terms, not according to others’ expectations. It’s important to understand what success means to you personally. 

Cultivate your professional tribe: seek out mentors for guidance, peers for support and sponsors who will advocate for your advancement. Building these relationships is crucial for your growth and success. 

Don’t hesitate to ask questions or seek help when needed. Doing so demonstrates good judgment, not weakness. It’s a sign of strength to acknowledge when you need support. 

Develop resilience without becoming rigid. Professional growth often comes from navigating unexpected challenges, so it’s important to be adaptable. 

Finally, recognise that your career will evolve through different phases. What works at one stage may need to change at another. Being open to this evolution and willing to adjust as necessary will help you maintain balance and continue progressing in your career. 

elisha.juttla@legalease.co.uk

‘Eventually you have to learn to trust yourself’ – Simpson Thacher’s Deborah Gruen on succeeding in law

Deborah Gruen, a former US Paralympic swimmer, now funds partner at Simpson Thacher in New York, reflects on the key skills needed to thrive in corporate law and the importance of setting personal goals

Why did you decide to become a funds lawyer?   

I was an economics major in college and was always comfortable with numbers. I found that corporate law, and particularly being a private funds lawyer, married together what I had loved about economics with being a lawyer.

I also like that corporate law is fundamentally about building a product where both sides gain something. I prefer that to a situation where you are constantly trying to tear the other side down. And, because you work with clients on a long-term basis, you really get to know them; there are days that I think some clients know more about me than my own family!  Lastly, I find that teamwork is critical in your day-to-day tasks. I enjoy talking to my colleagues across offices about the issues I’m facing and have found that collaboration leads to a far better product.  

What is your favourite thing about your job? 

 The opportunity to develop and test out new ideas!  It’s a privilege to be able to work with the clients and the other lawyers at Simpson Thacher because not only are they incredibly creative and smart, but they also are not afraid to take risks and try new things.  What starts out as a test case one day becomes the latest trend in private equity funds the next year. 

What is your proudest professional moment? 

Making partner at Simpson Thacher.  I have always looked at the partners in the firm as rockstars, and especially the partners in the funds group.  So, to be considered one of them, was – and continues to be –  an honour.  

What is a standout deal you’ve worked on? 

Helping Stonepeak with its first continuation vehicle for the Cologix recapitalisation. That was the first continuation vehicle I worked on and was the first time that I was so exposed to both deal-level and fund-level issues.  Often, we help in fundraising and answer a small handful of questions on specific investments, but in the continuation vehicle context, everything happens at the same time.  

What’s the biggest challenge you’ve overcome in your career?   

Learning to be confident. I’m tiny and literally have to look up to everyone else.  Even though nowadays people can’t normally see you because you’re on the phone or zoom, leading a call can be daunting.  But eventually you have to learn to trust yourself. 

What’s been your worst professional moment and what did you learn from it? 

Everyone has bad moments and for me they often come from taking on too much.  I’ve had to learn to delegate more and trust others, even if it means that they do something differently than I would have done it.  

What are the key skills you need to succeed in commercial law at a leading New York firm?  

Most importantly, you need to work hard.  It’s very similar to sports in that you have to practice and get in the reps. The other key skill is learning to work with others. My peers at Simpson Thacher are the most valuable resources that I have and learning to ask others for help, and in turn being available when they ask you questions, helps everyone. Given the amount of institutional knowledge our firm has, it’s very likely that when you see an issue for the first time, someone else has already found a way to address it.  

What advice do you have for aspiring young female lawyers who want to get to where you are? 

I think it’s important to set goals. When I swam, my goal was to medal.  When I started working at Simpson Thacher, I wanted to make partner.  I have found that setting goals helps keep me focused.

elisha.juttla@legalease.co.uk

Latham & Watkins revenue hits $7bn high as PEP surges 30%

Latham & Watkins saw global revenue surge by 23% in 2024 to a record high of  $7bn, with the growth in fee income helping profit per equity partner (PEP) soar by almost 30% to surpass $7m.

The firm’s turnover climbed by $1.3bn during the last calendar year to a new high of $7bn, up from $5.7bn the previous year. The increase is significantly more than the 11% growth Latham posted last year and means that the firm has more than doubled its revenue over the last seven years.

PEP hit $7.1m in 2024, up from $5.5m in 2023 – more than double the $3.5m recorded in the 2019 Global 100 table.

Revenue per lawyer (RPL) climbed 18%, from $1.65m to $1.95m, fueled by strong double-digit growth across key practice areas, including M&A, private equity, capital markets, banking, complex commercial litigation, and antitrust & competition.

Commenting on the firm’s performance, chair and managing partner Rich Trobman (pictured above) said: ‘We were at the centre of many of the year’s landmark deals and high profile cases, helping our clients seize opportunities, navigate challenges, and stay ahead of market shifts.’

While Latham does not disclose office-specific revenue, it is understood that London brought in an estimated $850m in turnover, with year-on-year growth up slightly more than the firm-wide average at 25%.

In a conversation with Legal Business on his first 100 days as City office head, Latham’s London managing partner Ed Barnett described the office as ‘driven, ambitious, and innovative’, emphasizing M&A, private equity, leveraged finance, capital markets, restructuring, litigation, and regulatory as key areas of focus.

The strong City performance comes despite the firm seeing a number of departures. High-yield partners Scott Colwell and Patrick Kwak left for Sidley, in October, following a five-partner sponsor-side leveraged finance team exit in August, led by former London managing partner Jayanthi Sadanandan and Sam Hamilton.

However the firm has continued to invest in talent, with total headcount up nearly 4% year-on-year, from 3,450 lawyers in 2023 to 3,584 last year. London has been a particular growth area, expanding by close to 50% over the last five years.

Notable London additions in 2024 included white-collar specialist Pamela Reddy, recruited to help build out the City litigation practice, and a banking and finance trio – Jonathan Brownson, Joydeep Choudhuri, and Prue Criddle – from Cahill Gordon & Reindel’s London office.

Further reinforcing its UK presence into 2025, the firm also welcomed banking partner Hugh O’Sullivan in January as well as tech partner Sophie Goossens and tax partner Serena Lee in February.

The firm also reformed its pay structure to better reward top performers, introducing a super points tier in reforms approved by partners last July. Latham introduced two additional tiers of 1,300 points and 1,700 points on top of its core modified lockstep of 350-900 points, as well as a bonus pool of up to 15% of its profits available for discretionary division among partners.

Fourteen partners worldwide are understood to sit on the first additional tier at 1,300 points, with a further eight now on the maximum 1,700 points. Two partners in London – including chair Richard Trobman – are understood to be at the top level. All of the remaining super pointers are based in the US.

‘We remain dedicated to serving as the go-to advisor for our clients. Our commitment to client service, excellence, and teamwork continues to drive us forward as we pursue our ambitious goals this year and into the future,’ Trobman concluded.

anna.huntley@legalease.co.uk

Climate change and collective proceedings: what businesses need to know

Collective proceedings are a longstanding mechanism for bringing claims in the US and Australia. They are now a feature of many legal systems around the world, including in the EU, England and Wales, and, most recently, Scotland.

Collective proceedings are typically used by multiple claimants who have the same or similar ground or grounds of claim against the same party, to seek redress for their losses.

Some recent high-profile examples of collective proceedings include claims against Apple for allegedly selling defective iPhones, Google for allegedly using unlawful tactics to block competition, and Amazon for alleged misleading advertising surrounding its Prime subscription service. Often, the loss suffered by each individual within the claimant group will be too small to make it economically viable for them to bring the claim alone. However, the combined loss of all claimants is normally significant, which makes it economically attractive and cost-effective to bring the claim collectively as a group.

Given the economies of scale that can be achieved by collectively pursuing a larger claim on behalf of a group, these proceedings will usually be attractive to external litigation funders. They will often finance the collective proceedings, in return for a proportion of any award of compensation/financial settlement agreed.

In this way, collective proceedings enable access to justice for claims that would not otherwise be pursued. This removes a significant hurdle for wronged consumers seeking compensation, but it also exposes businesses to claims they would not ordinarily face.

As more and more jurisdictions provide for collective proceedings, the number of such actions is increasing rapidly worldwide.

Climate change litigation

Also on the rise in recent years is climate change litigation – court cases against public bodies and corporations whose actions have allegedly had an adverse impact on the prevention of climate change – as concern around climate change continues to build globally. According to the UN, the number of climate change court cases initiated more than doubled between 2017 and 2020. This uptick has seen no sign of abating.

Recent years have seen a flurry of claims brought by environmentalist groups against their national governments, either for failing to achieve environmental targets they have set to tackle climate change, or for failing to set environmental targets that are ambitious enough. Since 2019, the Swiss, Dutch, and German governments have all been the subject of successful claims. Similar claims are ongoing in European jurisdictions against multinational oil corporations.

Use of collective proceedings to pursue climate claims

The growth in climate change claims brought by environmentalist groups against governments and corporations indicates that people are minded to hold powerful bodies to account when it comes to climate change. It is unsurprising, therefore, that, in jurisdictions with established collective proceedings procedures, climate change proceedings are emerging as a key theme.

The US has a history of collective proceedings (known there as ‘class actions’) dating back to the 19th century. No jurisdiction is more useful to those with younger collective proceedings regimes for predicting future trends, a current one being class actions against corporations for alleged ‘greenwashing’ practices (misrepresenting or exaggerating ethical and environmental credentials).

Starbucks and Colgate are both presently facing class actions for alleged ‘greenwashing’. The former, raised in the District of Columbia, relates to Starbucks advertising its tea and coffee as ‘ethical’ despite allegedly being sourced from farms accused of human rights violations. The latter, raised in California, relates to assertions by Colgate that its plastic toothpaste tubes are ‘recyclable’, when it is alleged, in reality, almost no recycling facilities in the US accept them.

The future of climate change collective proceedings in the UK

The viability of these types of claims in the UK will be determined by the outcome of the cases raised in the US, and in other jurisdictions with developed collective proceedings regimes. In Australia, a ‘greenwashing’ class action is currently pending against a major gas company, Santos, after it allegedly misleadingly claimed to produce ‘clean fuel’.

Central to the viability of these types of claims will be whether litigation funders are incentivised to back them.

The size of the claimant group is a relevant factor in securing funding. The bigger the claimant group, the larger the compensation payout if the claim is successful. Given the widespread impact of climate change, and the public awareness and activism in this space, claimant groups in these cases could be huge.

The likelihood of very large claimant groups is even greater where claims are brought under ‘opt-out’ procedure. Under ‘opt-in’ procedure, which is currently used in the UK (apart from for collective proceedings brought in the Competition Appeal Tribunal), claimants are required to ‘sign up’ to be part of the claimant group. Representative claims, a type of collective proceedings in England and Wales which involves one or more claimants raising a claim as representatives of other claimants with the same interest, are also raised by way of ‘opt-in’ procedure. Claimant groups under ‘opt-out’ procedure are typically larger, because anyone who meets the class requirements will become part of the group, without needing to actively ‘sign up’. A move to ‘opt-out’ in the UK is expected, with Scotland’s legislative framework already providing for this approach.

Climate change collective proceedings have the potential to give rise to very large claimant groups (especially if brought in jurisdictions that use ‘opt-out’ procedure), and, therefore, will attract significant awards of compensation if successful. This presents a potentially lucrative opportunity for litigation funders that choose to back them, as well as a significant financial exposure to the entities they are brought against.

UK governments (Westminster, and devolved governments in Scotland and Wales with responsibility for environmental matters), and corporations (especially those operating in sectors such as oil and gas and transport) should view collective proceedings relating to climate change as a relevant legal and financial risk.

Craig Watt is a partner and solicitor advocate and leads the corporate disputes practice at Brodies.

How to get to the top in M&A: leading female partners share their tips for success

For International Women’s Day Legal Business asked ten leading female M&A partners to share their tips for success for the next generation.


If you love what you do, stick with it. Be determined and take those opportunities—don’t wait for things just to happen to you. Make a plan and execute it.
Sally Wokes, Slaughter and May


If you find yourself as the only woman on a screen, use that platform to speak up and be vocal. Own the space and make your voice heard.
Claire Coppel, A&0 Shearman


Trust your instincts. Build strong relationships with people because, ultimately, that will win you work. Deep relationships allow you to know when someone needs you. Women excel at this—use that superpower to your advantage.
Kate Cooper, Freshfields


Lean into your job. It will be far more fulfilling if you choose an area you truly enjoy. If you can relate to it and it energises you, the challenges and stress will fade.
Annabelle Croker, A&O Shearman


If you’ve found something you enjoy, don’t opt out early. Focus on what’s in front of you—worry about next year when it comes.
Caroline Rae, Herbert Smith Freehills


Say yes to opportunities as they come. You never know which one will lead you to that promotion. Saying yes opens up doors you might not expect.
Fionnghuala Griggs, Linklaters


Look for a sponsor. Having someone with a reputable profile in the organisation who will back you and help open doors is incredibly powerful.
Katherine Moir, Clifford Chance


Work hard and enjoy it. If you enjoy what you do, people will want to be around you. It creates a virtuous circle—happiness helps you build better relationships.
Aisling Zarraga, Linklaters


You really have to want to do it. If your heart’s not in it, it will make things a lot harder in the long run. Don’t be driven by what others do—make sure you’re following your own path.
Lauren Honeyben, Freshfields


Always take the meeting. The support you provide to your clients between the deals is just as important, if not more important than the deal itself. Don’t count yourself out of the room because you’re not sure what you are going to say. Never shy away from an opportunity to build a relationship.
Melissa Fogarty, Clifford Chance

‘We need more women in the rooms where influential decisions are made’ – leading M&A partners have their say

Legal Business gathered some of the leading female M&A partners at UK origin firms in the City together ahead of International Women’s Day to discuss the reality of making it to the top in a practice that remains dominated by men. 

Clifford Chance partners Katherine Moir and Melissa Fogarty, Linklaters’ Aisling Zarraga and Finn Griggs, Slaughter and May’s Sally Wokes, HSF’s Caroline Rae, Freshfields’ Kate Cooper and Lauren Honeyben and A&O Shearman’s Annabelle Croker and Claire Coppel sat down with Georgina Stanley and Anna Huntley for a frank discussion about everything from imbalanced expectations, to the pros and  cons of being a role model and why there still aren’t enough women in the room where decisions are made, as well as sharing their tips for success. 

LB: How has gender diversity improved since you started your career in law? 

Melissa Fogarty: There’s a vast difference now in terms of the diversity of personalities you meet on opposite sides of M&A deals. When I started, I thought I had to play a specific role in negotiations, pitching, and relationship-building—shaped by the dominant figures of the time: confident, mostly male, larger-than-life.

Aisling Zarraga: I remember starting in the City in the ’90s, and having an accent immediately made you question, ‘Where do I fit in?’ Being a woman as well added even more chips on your shoulder. But that’s changed massively.

Katherine Moir: I agree that among law firms and corporate clients a lot has changed, but in some heavily male-dominated industries, I still often find myself the only woman in the room. It doesn’t faze me now. In some ways, it makes you stand out—which can be an advantage—but it can be intimidating for more junior lawyers.

Claire Coppel: I often feel a sense of responsibility to use my voice and make an impact as one of the only women in the room—or on the screen.

‘I still often find myself the only woman in the room. It doesn’t faze me now.’
Katherine Moir

LB: How do you respond to being the only woman in the room?

Kate Cooper: The reality is, when you say hi, often no one even has to ask your name—you stand out by default. You make a choice to embrace that spotlight and use it in a positive way, or you let it intimidate you.

Sally Wokes: You have to be proactive in using your voice—confidence, speaking up, and making yourself heard are still crucial attributes and skills. One real sign of progress in the past decade is the recognition that men and women often bring different strengths. Instead of ignoring those differences, we’re learning to embrace them and channel them in a positive way.

Caroline Rae: That said, there’s no question that you still have to be very resilient. I try to be honest with our female talent—resilience is still essential because, despite progress, the job is demanding and the world hasn’t changed that much.

LB: In your experience are there still different expectations placed on women in senior roles? 

‘The ‘double bind’—if you’re a successful woman, you can’t be a nice woman—always gets me. You don’t have to be a certain type of woman to be successful anymore, but that perception is not entirely gone.’
Finn Griggs

Finn Griggs: The ‘double bind’—if you’re a successful woman, you can’t be a nice woman—always gets me. You don’t have to be a certain type of woman to be successful anymore, but that perception is not entirely gone.

Wokes: We’re still often labelled differently to men— being called ‘aggressive,’ for example. The truth is, I don’t believe women are more aggressive than their male equivalents, but because it’s not as expected from them, it’s commented on.

Annabelle Croker: Women tend to be very team-oriented and inclusive, and there’s a much greater appreciation of those strengths now. Some people excel at mentoring, others at sponsorship, technical skills, or client relations—harnessing a broad range of skills in both men and women is what makes a team stronger.

LB – Do you feel a personal obligation to champion other women?

Rae: Yes, and it is important that we do but I don’t like the idea that it’s our responsibility to look after the women. Male partners should be just as invested in supporting and promoting female talent. It’s a shared responsibility.

Zarraga: Like the quote: ‘there’s a special place in hell for women who don’t support other women’ – I remember feeling incredibly guilty when I once had to admit that a female lawyer was not performing as well as her male peers.

Cooper: Ultimately, I think you have to be careful not to get dumped with too much just because you have more empathy in your little finger than eight male partners combined. Sometimes I worry that we’re expected to be the ‘soft’ or ‘maternal’ ones.

Honeyben: We do often hold ourselves to a higher standard, putting more pressure on ourselves to be everything to everyone—championing female associates, protecting our own teams. That can create unrealistic expectations and add extra weight to what we already carry.

Griggs: We must hold ourselves to the exact same standard because, otherwise, there’s a risk that people will think women only succeed because of diversity initiatives.

LB: How do you feel about being seen as a role model to the next generation?

‘I sometimes feel a bit cagey explaining ‘how I did it’ because, honestly, I don’t have all the answers’
Aisling Zarraga

Zarraga: I sometimes feel a bit cagey when explaining ‘how I did it’ because, honestly, I don’t have all the answers. My life isn’t a roadmap—everyone has to carve out their own path.

Moir: I still get trainees and juniors asking me how I balance it all, especially with wanting a family. I’m pretty sure the men don’t get approached asking: ‘Please help us and show us it can be done.’ I think we’ll continue to have that role for a long time because we’re still in the process of changing expectations.

Honeyben: Ultimately, we can’t just tell an associate: ‘this is how you do it.’ It’s a personal journey.

LB: How have attitudes towards work-life balance changed and how much impact has it had 

Moir:  It’s brilliant to see men being vocal about paternity leave, prioritising childcare and school events, etc. There was a time when I was the only one speaking up about it, but now the men are often saying it too, and it’s great to see that shift.

Fogarty: It’s fascinating how quickly the dynamic has shifted. It rolls off people’s tongues now that everyone has other commitments, and that’s a lovely change, but I do sometimes sit there thinking, I never would have had the courage to say that back in the day.

Croker: Shared paternity leave, COVID and the shift to working from home have gone some way towards levelling the playing field between men and women. It’s removed some of the traditional barriers and allowed everyone to have more flexibility.

Cooper: I completely agree. Pre-COVID, when I tried to work from home one day a week, I was seen as a beacon of adaptability. Post-COVID, that outdated view—where working from home was seen as something only mothers did to juggle laundry or family duties—is gone.

Rae: The new flexibility has been great. Returning from maternity leave is challenging but I hope the post-Covid approach makes it easier for our female associates when they come back to work. Honestly, I look back now and I’m not sure how we did it before.

 

LB: What about perceptions around having a family? 

‘You have to be careful not to get dumped with too much just because you have more empathy in your little finger than eight male partners combined.’
Kate Cooper

Zarraga: Before, if you went down the family route, people would question when you’d be able to return to a client facing role, or they’d assume you’d go for a role with steadier hours. Now, it’s more about wanting you to come back.

Fogarty: That said, the lack of a viable childcare system for the early years is a systemic issue in our country. That’s something we as women need to campaign for because, until we have affordable childcare that aligns with working life, women and men in all industries will continue to find that period very challenging.

Also, what alarms me is that some young women still worry about how focusing on their career might not be considered ‘attractive.’ I think that mindset is still there—the pressure for women to prioritise family over their career.

LB: How much balance do you think it’s possible to have as an M&A partner?

 

‘I think we will have achieved true diversity when the question ‘How do you do it?’ is no longer directed at women’
Melissa Fogarty

Wokes: The question everyone asks is ‘can you have it all?’, and the answer is it depends on what your ‘all’ is – it has to be realistic, taking account of the demands of the job. Once you’ve landed on that and made peace with it, you do feel you have balance. For example, I do have a hands-on role with my young children – but it doesn’t necessarily mean that would be everyone’s idea of a balanced life.

Coppel: We can never dictate the timetable of a deal. Having the right-sized deal team is important to maintain flexibility, and life has evolved beyond investment bankers having complete control. Now, where you can manage the project aspects of a deal, you can gain some of that control back.

Moir: I don’t think this is only an issue which affects M&A lawyers. This has become a more normalised model of working—combining work and family life, which might mean working late into the evenings but now we can do that from home.

Griggs: I was told to think of it as a work-life blend. I realised my life isn’t perfectly balanced all the time, but if I can look at the totality of it as a blend that works for me, then I’m okay with it.

Cooper: I find the concept of work-life balance to be a bit outdated, especially when it’s always levelled at women. No one’s asking Roger Federer how he balanced everything to become the best at what he does.

Fogarty: I couldn’t agree more, I think we will have achieved true diversity when the question ‘How do you do it?’ is no longer directed at women. That question carries an implication that it’s our responsibility to manage everything—to keep the house, be the parent, and do all the things society expects us to do. And if we’re working, somehow, we’re not keeping up with our ‘real’ responsibilities.

LB: Is there anything more clients could do to help advance women?

Coppel: The biggest difference clients make is promoting you and providing referral opportunities. I don’t think their demands will change, and nor should they – they have investors and other stakeholders to serve. But having clients who give you opportunities to lead—that was a game changer in my career.

Zarraga: If they can be your cheerleader, that’s incredibly valuable. I think it’s even more important for women than men to have that kind of backing. A supportive client relationship can be just as powerful as having a confident, seasoned mentor.

Croker: Fostering close relationships with clients is key. When you’re part of the flow of their work, the demands don’t feel as overwhelming and unexpected. It’s about building a sense of camaraderie and making the work enjoyable, even when the pressure is on.

LB: What steps can be taken to accelerate women’s influence in law and representation in leadership? 

‘When I was a trainee back in 2010, we used to joke that there were more ‘Richards’ in the team than female partners.’
Claire Coppel

Coppel: When I was a trainee back in 2010, we used to joke that there were more ‘Richards’ in the team than female partners. A lot has changed since then – this year our roster of London corporate partner candidates is all female.

Croker: If you look at the last five years, we’ve seen a sea change in female partner promotions. Getting more women into senior management positions—that’s the next challenge we need to crack.

Fogarty: It’s not just about getting women into management; it’s about soft power. That’s the real shift we need. We need more women in the rooms where influential decisions are made—the kind of influence that helps shape careers.

Honeyben: I do think progress has been made in recent years, including at the most senior levels which is encouraging. However, there is still more to do. The more role models there are in leadership positions (not only in your own firm but also others) are and the more people realise there isn’t only one way for a leader to be, then hopefully the younger generations will feel empowered and see it as more achievable.

Cooper: It is hard not to be impatient.  It’s happening, but realistically it will take another decade before we reach a point where you look up to leadership around the city in M&A and don’t see a group of many men and far fewer women.

Photo credit: Juan Trujillo Andrades 

Revolving Doors: DLA Piper makes lev fin play with A&O Shearman hire as partners from collapsed Memery Crystal move on

Leading the high-profile moves of recent weeks, DLA Piper hired A&O Shearman leveraged finance partner Gordon Houseman, who has joined the firm’s international finance practice.

Houseman, a Legal 500 next generation partner for London high-yield finance, has become A&O Shearman’s latest high-yield departure following a series of departures from legacy Allen & Overy, including former Legal 500 Hall of Famer high-yield partner Kevin Muzilla, who retired in the lead up to the A&O Shearman merger in May 2024.

With over a decade of advisory experience, Houseman advises organisations across various industries in debt and equity capital markets, specialising in high-yield bonds, Term Loan B, private credit, and corporate and acquisition financing, while also supporting restructuring and insolvency matters.

Elsewhere in the City, Latham & Watkins hired tax partner Serena Lee from Akin and EU and copyright partner Sophie Goossens from Reed Smith.

Lee, a Legal 500 next generation partner for London corporate tax, joins after eight years at Akin and had previously spent a year as a legal adviser at HMRC and three years as an associate at legacy Allen & Overy, where she also qualified. She has particular expertise in investment fund work.

‘Serena’s sophisticated transactional knowledge and technical expertise will be an invaluable asset to our clients,’ said Katharine Moir, global chair of the firm’s tax department in a statement.

Goossens has moved after nearly eight years at Reed Smith where she co-led the firm’s AI team and its games team. She joins Latham’s AI, communications and copyright practices and as a member of the firm’s technology industry group.

Prior to Reed Smith, her experience includes three years as a senior attorney at August Debouzy in Paris and a year as head of legal at Paris-based music production company Green United Music.

Ed Barnett, Latham’s London office managing partner said in a statement: ‘Sophie has built an impressive track record advising leading technology and media companies, making her a great addition to our practice in London and globally, as well as a tremendous asset to our clients.’

Proskauer hired M&A partner Sylvain Dhennin, who joins the firm after nearly a decade as a partner at Hogan Lovells. With experience advising private equity sponsors as well as financial institutions and corporate, Dhennin’s arrival sees the firm continue the private capital buildout of the last year, with hires including legacy Allen & Overy banking head Philip Bowden joining alongside Megan Lawrence last July, Cahill partners Jake Keaveny, Warren Newton, and Court Tisdale in September and October, and former A&O Shearman and Milbank partner John Goldfinch in November.

Jeremy Dennison rejoined Travers Smith after seven years in-house at midmarket PE house Livingbridge, where he was general counsel 2018-23 and partner and general counsel from January 2023. He left Travers as a senior associate in 2018 and rejoins as a partner in its private equity and financial sponsors (PEFS) group.

The firm also brought funds lawyer John Daghlian into its asset management sector group as a senior consultant.

Continuing its London expansion, Paul Weiss welcomed BCLP tax partner Kyle O’Sullivan to the firm. O’Sullivan joined BCLP in a vertical move in April last year following eight years as an associate at Slaughter and May. His practice covers UK corporate tax law, corporate financing and disputes with HMRC. He has notable experience in the energy sector.

Paul Weiss has grown rapidly in London since its English law launch in November 2023. Recent additions include Simpson Thacher capital markets partner Uma Sud and financial regulatory partners Prem Mohan and Revathi Raghavan who joined from Kirkland & Ellis.

Ashurst bolstered its securitisation offering with the appointment of Tauhid Ijaz from Hogan Lovells. Ijaz, who started his career at Clifford Chance, has joined after 26 years at Hogan Lovells. He advised on complex structured finance and securitisation transactions, including significant risk transfer, balance sheet management, consumer asset securitisations, and funding transactions for specialist funders.

Speaking to Legal Business, Ijaz said: ‘The market presents numerous opportunities, many of which Ashurst is actively pursuing. Tom Picton has been instrumental in developing the practice, and I am excited to join and contribute to its continued success.’

Greenberg Traurig hired banking and financial services partner Kevin-Paul Deveau from Reed Smith. Deveau brings experience in private credit, bespoke financing arrangements, acquisition finance, and fund finance. He joins the firm’s London and Middle East finance practices.

Deveau has moved after six years at Reed Smith and previously spent time at Dechert and Clifford Change in London as well as Blake, Cassels & Graydon in Toronto, where he began his legal career.

‘Kevin-Paul brings a breadth of multijurisdictional legal expertise that plays well to our strengths in global finance,’ Greenberg executive chairman Richard Rosenbaum said in a statement.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe hired a three-lawyer team led by restructuring partner Prav Reddy from Katten Muchin Rosenman. He joins after just under five years at Katten and previously spent 13 years at Charles Russell Speechlys.

Reddy advises office holders, creditors, debtors, PE funds, banks and distressed companies on cross-border restructurings.

‘Orrick is well known for its collaborative approach and innovative advice. I’m excited to join this entrepreneurial team and to continue building a distinctive offering for funds, financial investors and companies together’, Reddy said in a statement.

Harbottle & Lewis added private client disputes partner Charles Lloyd from Macfarlanes and reputation management partner Michael Yates from Taylor Wessing, with the pair set to join in April.

Lloyd, a Legal 500 Hall of Famer for contentious trusts and probate, arrives after nearly 25 years at Macfarlanes and brings experience in private client disputes, particularly international trusts and estates litigation.

Information litigator Yates joins after just under four years at Taylor Wessing and previously spent time at Lee & Thompson and Schillings.

Harbottles co-managing partner Tony Littner said in a statement: ‘Charles and Michael are perfectly placed to complement our existing practice groups and contribute significantly to our continued growth and success.’

The fallout from the collapse of Memery Crystal parent RBG Holdings continued, with Haynes Boone picking up Memery Crystal corporate partner Lesley Gregory.

Gregory brings experience across public and private M&A, and joins former colleagues including Nick Davis, who moved to Haynes Boone from Memery Crystal as London office co-head last month as part of a seven-lawyer hire from the defunct firm.

Keystone Law welcomed eight lawyers to its ranks including Kirkland restructuring partner Elaine Nolan, a Legal 500 leading partner for corporate restructuring and insolvency, and Memery Crystal duo, Carl Rohsler, a Legal 500 Hall of Famer for London gaming and betting, and Nick Alfillé, formerly head of Memery Crystal’s corporate team.

Nolan, who began her career at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, has moved after almost 17 years at Kirkland. She advises strategic investors, sponsors and insolvency practitioners, on national and international financial restructurings and insolvencies.

In a statement posted on LinkedIn, Nolan said she was excited to be working with fellow Kirkland alumni Gabe Harley, who moved to Keystone in September 2024 and that the pair would, ‘continue to advise on various restructuring matters, with a particular focus on retail and consumer mandates’.

The other new hires are London family law partner David Thompson, who arrives from Seddons; commercial property partner Jo Bewley, who arrives from BPE Solicitors; residential property partner Felicity Sergeant, who arrives from Streathers Solicitors; employment partner Emma Loveday-Hill, who arrives from Prettys; and corporate and commercial partner Daniel Rose, who was general counsel at Dorfman Family Office.

Hot on the heels of hiring a 25-strong team from Memery Crystal, Fladgate has turned to another collapsed law firm, Avonhurst, to pick up corporate partner Josh Swerner.

Swerner centres his practice on PE transactions, domestic and cross-border M&A, joint ventures and corporate advisory work. With stints as CMS and Linklaters on his CV, he arrives at Fladgate following five years at Avonhurst, which has ceased to trade according to its website.

Finally, outside London, DAC Beachcroft made a pair of vertical hires, bringing in Addleshaw Goddard construction legal director Thomas Hurst in Leeds and Bevan Brittan technology disputes senior associate Wesley O’Brien in Bristol. Both lawyers join DAC as partners.

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk

Vertical progress: CMS corporate co-heads on their plans for the practice

While CMS is perhaps best-known for its top-tier reputation in the commercial property sector, its strengths as a corporate dealmaking machine can sometimes be overlooked.

Comprising more than 450 partners and over 1,400 lawyers around the world, in 2023-24 the global corporate practice contributed 29.6% of the firm’s total revenues of €1.957bn, second only to disputes at 29.9%.

The firm also consistently ranks in the global top 10 for M&A deal volume; last year advising on 453 announced transactions, according to London Stock Exchange Group data, putting it sixth place in the global rankings, up from seventh in 2023.

Announcing the firm’s financial results last year, managing partner Stephen Millar underlined the firm’s international identity and re-emphasised the importance of pursuing a ‘global’ strategy.

For corporate co-head Victoria Henry (pictured above), this identity is deeply rooted in her practice. ‘In corporate, more than half of our deals have an international element,’ she explains, adding that the firm broad coverage across Europe, where they have 50 offices across 26 countries, and the Middle East, where they have over 90 lawyers in six countries – as one of their most undersung assets.

‘Lots of firms talk about satellite offices, but where we are different is that we don’t just have two men and a dog there – we have proper teams that handle both international cross-border work and local matters, meaning we are truly embedded,’ she explains.

Away from Europe and the Middle East, fellow corporate co-head Dipesh Santilale (pictured right) points to Hong Kong and Singapore as key growth targets for the firm, particularly in the wake of US retrenchment from the region. ‘With certain US firms pulling back, we’re seeing significant growth opportunities for us in the region, and we are looking at similar growth opportunities across a number of jurisdictions,’ he states.

This January, the firm added to its Hong Kong base with the hire of former Morrison Foerster corporate partner Steven Tran, while other recent appointments to the Hong Kong office include funds partners Paul Moloney and Helen Wang, who joined from Mayer Brown in the latter half of last year.

There has been movement in the other direction, including former international private equity group head and Legal 500 leading partner Jason Zemmel, who left for McDermott in October, while the firm did also make some redundancies in corporate in 2023, with up to 19 lawyers losing their roles.

Henry explains: ‘We’d been flying high on the back of the merger [the 2017 combination of CMS, Nabarro and Olswang] in a positive way, which created a structure that kept growing. As the market paused and work levels stabilised, it allowed us to take a step back and assess where we were.’

‘It was never about the individuals, but about addressing structural needs,’ she adds. ‘It was a difficult process, but ultimately, it served as a catalyst for a more positive attitude within the group and an opportunity to feel refreshed. I feel like we’ve come out the other side now,’ she continues.

So, what does the other side look like? The corporate practice still boasts over 150 lawyers in the UK alone – a number Henry characterises as ‘not disproportionate when it comes to servicing a broad range of clients across all sectors on everything from venture capital investments to public markets and takeovers.’

‘It’s often challenging to convey that our approach is to look at the sectors as verticals,’ Santilale adds. Using the energy sector as an example, he elaborates: ‘For instance, we handled last year’s Equinor-Shell joint venture, creating the UK’s largest independent oil and gas company. At the same time, we also regularly support Equinor on a number of very interesting VC investments into new clean energy technologies.’

For Santilale, this vertical approach sets the firm apart from competitors who are becoming more ‘boutique-like, focusing on big litigation and large corporate deals.’ He continues: ‘For us, our increasing specialisation means we have the ability to differentiate ourselves by being able to provide those services and a wider range of services and sector expertise that others cannot.’

The firm’s current sector focus covers specialisms in energy and infrastructure, real estate, financial services, TMT, hotels, leisure and consumer, and looking ahead, sector convergence is a key strategy for the corporate team.

‘Our focus has been on identifying these and other exciting, high-growth areas where we can bring together our specialisms to present a more targeted offering that captures what we believe to be areas with significant growth potential in the market, and an already outstanding foundation of expertise within our firm,’ Santilale adds.

Henry concludes: ‘Over time, there will be a sharper focus on this as a way to further differentiate ourselves. However, we are committed to servicing a diverse client base and maintaining a high level of expertise across the board. Any refinement will be an organic development that reflects where the market is heading.’

‘Debunk assumptions by doing surprising things’ – Paul Weiss’s Nicole Kar on succeeding in City law

Ahead of International Women’s Day, Nicole Kar, global co-chair of antitrust at Paul Weiss, discusses thriving in the deep end and why there is still more room at the top for women in law.

Why did you decide to be a lawyer?

I’m naturally bookish and love a good argument. My parents called me a bush lawyer long before I knew what law was – I think my first argument was over pocket money! But there were no lawyers on either side of my family. My mother gave up her job when she had children and my father was in finance, so I was a bit of an anomaly.

Now, I also have my youngest sister, who’s a phenomenal employment lawyer, for a bit of company around the family dinner table when I get home to Australia.

What is your favourite thing about your job?

I love working with really smart people, both in the firm and clients, and learning about their markets. I love the challenge of solving a knotty legal problem and getting a deal cleared in difficult circumstances. I never stopped loving learning, and I’ve had the chance in the last year of understanding a lot more about the US legal system and US politics which has been fantastic.

What is your proudest professional moment?

As a junior lawyer in Australia, the client – a US entrant into the cinema market – asked me to represent them in the first arbitration under the Cinemas Code. It was daunting to be opposite a senior partner from another firm, but I gained a lot of confidence from the faith the client put in me. I dissected the facts and legal principles, constructed an argument, and we won: securing access to show films distributed by the US film majors.

I’ve always learned best by being thrown in the deep end – it’s not the best learning process for everyone, but I thrive when I’m confronted by something novel and untested.

What is a standout matter or deal you’ve worked on?

I recently worked on IBM’s $6.4bn acquisition of Hashicorp. While I’ve done a few software deals in the past, this one was on a much bigger scale and had much higher stakes. The client was a real pleasure to deal with – completely passionate about what they do and gave me the chance to see some incredibly clever software engineers in action. It was also great working with our US M&A team on such a consequential matter.

What is the biggest challenge you’ve overcome in your career?

I am fortunate to have an incredibly supportive husband who is also in law. He’s always helped with the children and understood the pressures of the job. When my son was a baby, he was quite poorly and, at the same time, the senior partner in my team had just retired. I was under a lot of pressure to return to work after only a few months of maternity leave and balancing home life with being a relatively new partner was tough.

What has been your worst professional moment and what did you learn from it?

Wow, I’ve had a few. I’ve made mistakes in my career that, at the time, I thought were career-ending – like sending an email to the wrong person or forgetting cases in a bundle for court. I’ve also had some bad moments when you lose in court or before an agency, despite you and your team being exhausted and fully believing in the arguments you were making and evidence you presented. The ability to pick yourself up, dust yourself off and go and win the next one is how you carve out a long career. I’ve been lucky enough to work alongside some incredibly clever and talented CEOs and M&A leads who’ve said to me, ‘If you’re winning all the time, you’re not doing the hardest deals’.

What are the key skills you need to succeed in City law and competition law specifically?

You need to stay curious throughout your career – about the law, how it evolves over time and why. In competition law specifically, it’s crucial to understand how markets work, why market failures happen and what the underlying economics tells you about a market. You need to remain flexible in terms of learning new things – for example I’ve had to retool to be able to advise on national security and foreign investment screening. You also need to be resilient, as it can be a hugely rewarding yet high-pressure job, especially when so much is at stake – including, in some cases, the CEO’s job. You have to feel very responsible for the human side of the clients you advise.

How much progress has there been in women in law since you started your career?

A lot. Many senior women in the City have shown that you can have a career and a vibrant family life. I’ve had strong female (and male) mentors in my time, as well as seen examples of how not to be. But we still have a way to go in hitting female lawyer representation at the senior levels of firms and in the ‘rooms where it happens’. We shouldn’t be complacent about this. It’s been great to join a firm where there are fantastic senior women in management and leading fantastic practices who say, ‘If you have a problem please call me, that’s what I’m here for’.

What still needs to improve and what’s holding it back?

Assumptions can still be made about your commitment or your availability if you have caring responsibilities. You need to debunk assumptions by doing surprising things – so taking that international client trip when you have small children or making weekend calls work. There can still be an assumption in business that we can’t make part-time or flexible working work, when in reality, you can – you just need to be open to experimenting.

We also need to think hard about how the private sector can reduce childcare as a barrier to women’s re-entry into the workforce, and I’m involved in charity projects aimed at lowering these barriers.

I’m also involved in our vacation scheme, which we’ve tried to make truly open from a social mobility perspective by paying for travel, accommodation and meals, ensuring we attract the best people to the firm, regardless of their economic background.

What advice do you have for aspiring young female lawyers?

Time in reconnaissance is never wasted. Learn what you can from those around you and from prominent role models, even if you don’t have the ‘perfect’ female mentor around you.

Also try to be kind to yourself – I’ve missed my fair share of date nights, friends’ birthdays and other things that are important to me.

We’re human beings – you don’t have to be perfect across every facet of your life and it’s okay to be imperfect. I’ve also been fortunate to have had help at home (and to be able to afford that) and since my family is in another hemisphere, I’ve never hesitated to ask for help when needed.  I’m certainly not superwoman nor do I pretend to be.

elisha.juttla@legalease.co.uk

Payments, takeovers, and AI on the bill at the 2025 Legal Business Corporate and M&A Summit

Legal Business returned to the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre this Wednesday (5 March) for its 2025 corporate and M&A summit, welcoming over 150 delegates from across the legal profession, from top M&A partners and in-house counsel to representatives from the corporate and financial services worlds.

The event was sponsored by White & Case, KPMG Law, Datasite, Interpolitan, and Shieldpay, with panelists from additional firms including Baker McKenzie, Eversheds Sutherland, Orrick, Travers Smith, and Taylor Wessing.

KPMG Law’s head of corporate deals and structuring Kate Eades opened the day with a keynote speech covering the state of the market in 2024 and expectations for 2025.

Shieldpay chief executive officer Sophie Condie chaired the first panel, ‘When Payments Break M&A: Lessons on hidden deal killers & how to solve them’ – a discussion of the importance of robust payment systems to ensure deals do not fall at what Condie called the crucial ‘last hurdle’.

Condie was joined onstage by Ogilvy Wachtel founding partner Robert Ogilvy Watson, Orrick global emerging markets practice lead Shawn Atkinson, and Baker McKenzie associate Jacob Turner.

Next, Eades returned to the stage to chair ‘W&I Insurance: Understanding the growing impact of Warranty & Indemnity insurance in M&A deals’, alongside KPMG Law corporate deals and structuring partner Paul Kelly, London Stock Exchange Group group legal corporate head Will Slaiding, Lockton EMEA energy and infrastructure head Ross Lima, and Marsh private equity and M&A UK placement leader and transactional risk practice senior vice president Charles Sunley.

The participants discussed the growing popularity of warranty and indemnity insurance beyond PE and across M&A, the growing flexibility of W&I insurance offerings, and how it impacts the dealmaking process.

Next up was the first of the day’s three fireside chats, with Eversheds Sutherland partners Ceri-Ann McGraa and Jon Gill and Tech Universal Ventures group legal counsel Nehzan Ekkeri giving an overview of the state of the private capital market.

With trillions of dry powder to deploy and an exit environment that remains difficult, the panelists also noted higher levels of uncertainty around ESG than ever – and no sign of the 2025 M&A boom many in the sector hoped for.

After a short break for coffee, refreshments, and networking, the delegates returned to the conference hall for ‘Defence Dynamics: Navigating Takeover Threats and Activist Challenges’.

With White & Case partner Guy Potel as chair, the panel was a lively discussion of what happens in a takeover bid or an activist challenge, and how lawyers can help ensure corporates are prepared to navigate the issues that arise. In particular, the participants noted the requirements of the takeover code, the distinct dynamics of takeovers in the UK market, and the importance of communications both internally and in public.

The other panelists were The Takeover Panel deputy director general James Arculus, M&G head of corporate finance and stewardship Rupert Krefting, Citi managing director Sian Evans, and Lazard global technology managing director Keiran Wilson.

The final panel before lunch was ‘AI in the Due Diligence Process: How Technology is Shaping M&A’, with Datasite VP Sam Dormon joined by DAZN corporate and business affairs senior legal counsel Thomas Maw and corporate partners Tom Hartwright from Travers Smith and Jonny Bethell from Taylor Wessing.

The panelists discussed the increasing use of artificial intelligence as a tool in dealmaking, with some debate over how far large language models will allow corporates to handle elements of due diligence in house, and a focus on the overriding importance of trust in ensuring corporates have faith in their legal counsel’s use of the technology.

The delegates then broke from panels for lunch and networking, before they returned for another fireside chat on ‘M&A and Antitrust – Navigating the evolving merger control landscape’.

White & Case partner Michael Engel and Fingleton director Timothy Geer surveyed the regulatory landscape in the UK, US, and EU. Even with uncertainty in the US, they identified a general move away from the stricter environment of recent years and towards providing a ‘clearer path to yes’. At the same time, they argued that corporates still need to be ready to respond to politicised reviews.

Next, Legal 500 and Legal Business editorial director Georgina Stanley chaired a panel with White & Case partner Di Yu, Lawrence Stephens director James Lyons, Britton & Time Solicitors head of corporate and commercial Ki Pons, and Interpolitan Money vice president, head of legal services Daniel Dunne, titled ‘Mitigating Risk in Unstable Times: How Alternative Banking and Payment Solutions Drive M&A Success’.

The panelists discussed issues that can arise in payments and how to respond to them, with a focus on the importance of setting up a process as early as possible. They then discussed some of the biggest risks in the payments world, from data privacy to always evolving anti-money-laundering regulations.

The event concluded with the third and final fireside chat of the day, ‘The Team Behind the Deal: Legal Leadership in M&A’, with Legal 500 London editor Cameron Purse talking to Mila Trezza, executive coach and founder at Coaching Lawyers, on the importance of leadership skills in pulling together a successful M&A team.

After some quick closing remarks from KPMG Law’s Paul Kelly, the delegates moved on for a final networking session with drinks and canapes.

Thanks to all the attendees, sponsors, and panelists for an engaging and thought-provoking event covering some of the biggest issues in dealmaking.

alexander.ryan@legalbusiness.co.uk

Kirkland and Davis Polk among firms advising on Sycamore’s $10bn take-private of Walgreens

Kirkland & Ellis, Ropes & Gray, Debevoise and Plimpton, Latham & Watkins, Davis Polk & Wardwell and Bass Berry & Sims have all helped to guide private equity firm Sycamore Partners $10bn take-private acquisition of Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA), which includes high street pharmacy chain Boots.

A Kirkland team led by New York corporate partners Edward Lee, Rachael Coffey and Daniel Wolf is advising WBA on the transaction. Ropes & Gray is advising WBA on the healthcare regulatory aspects of the deal.

Debevoise is advising Stefano Pessina, executive chairman of the Walgreens Boots Alliance Board of Directors, while a Davis Polk team led by New York corporate partners Brian Wolfe, Darren Schweiger and Michael Senders is advising Sycamore on the deal.

Tennessee-based law firm Bass Berry & Sims is acting as healthcare regulatory counsel to Sycamore, with a team led by partners Michael R. Hess, Dawn Perez-Slavinski, Jeanne Marie Evans, Mary Beth Fortugno and T. Stephen C. Taylor.

Latham is advising a range of banks and global investment firms acting as funding sources with a large team of more than 22 partners across offices in the US and London, including capital markets partners Michael Benjamin, Andrew Baker and Brittany Ruiz; and finance partners Alfred Xue, Jesse Sheff and Corey Wright.

Boots, as part of multinational health and beauty group Alliance Boots, was acquired by Walgreens in 2014 in a £5.6bn combination that created Walgreens Boots Alliance.

Alliance Boot’s majority owner PE firm KKR was advised by Simpson Thacher on the 2014 deal, while Walgreens was advised by Wachtell and legacy Allen & Overy.

Walgreens Boots Alliance’s chief legal officer is Marco Pagni, who was formerly general counsel of Alliance Boots. Pagni was appointed to his current role shortly after the WBA merger.

WBA shareholders will receive total consideration consisting of $11.45 per share in cash at closing of the transaction, which is expected to take place in the fourth quarter of 2025. WBA shares were trading 29% lower at $8.85 on December 9 last year, the day before the first reports of the mooted deal emerged.

The $11.45 per share price gives the company an equity value of around $10bn, or up to $23.7bn including aspects such as net debt, capital leases, and the firm’s opioid liability. The company’s portfolio of brands, including Walgreens and Boots, will remain unchanged.

Excluding Stefano Pessina and John Lederer, who recused themselves, the WBA Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposed transaction. Pessina, WBA’s executive chair and largest shareholder, will keep a minority shareholding in the business as part of the deal.

Tim Wentworth, CEO of WBA, said in a statement: ‘While we are making progress against our ambitious turnaround strategy, meaningful value creation will take time, focus and change that is better managed as a private company. Sycamore will provide us with the expertise and experience of a partner with a strong track record of successful retail turnarounds.’

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk

‘All the stars aligned for London’: Hogan Lovells closes in on $3bn mark as UK revenues rise 8%

Hogan Lovells has posted an 8.7% increase in global revenues to move within touching distance of $3bn, with profit per equity partner (PEP) up 12.1% to pass the $3m mark.

The international firm has announced turnover of $2.97bn (£2.32bn) for 2024, rising from $2.73bn in 2023, with UK revenues of $577m accounting for just under 20% of the total.

PEP rose from $2.74m to $3.07m (£2.4m), while revenue per lawyer inched up by 3% to $1.1m (£858,000) from last year’s $1.07m.

The UK revenue total of $577m is an 8% increase on $534m in 2023, and the firm has now seen UK turnover rise 22% over the past two years.

Speaking to Legal Business, CEO Miguel Zaldivar (pictured) described himself as being ‘super proud and super happy’ with the results. ‘2023 was our best-ever year, and when you beat your best-ever year by 9%, that’s a success,’ he said.

Touching on what had driven the success, Zaldivar picked out factors including US litigation, trade, and the firm’s strength in London.

‘London was also a big driver of our success – all the stars aligned for London,’ he said. ‘It wasn’t limited to one practice area: litigation in London had a great year, but also the transactional side, and our sweet spot, the regulatory practices.’

‘We had a record year in our litigation practice in the US, and that really drove profits up,’ he added. ‘Our global trade practice also accounts for our success story in 2024. The group had the busiest year ever – it is recognised in every market. As the oldest international firm in Washington, that deep bench of trade lawyers in the US drove a lot of work into the firm.’

Breaking down revenue by regions and practices area underlines strong continuity from the previous year.

Revenue from the Americas ticked up from 48% to 49%, with billings in the US up by approximately 14% from the previous year. EMEA’s contribution decreased slightly from 47% to 46% – while billings still rose 6% – and Asia-Pacific continued to account for the remaining 5%.

‘The type of firm we are is very different from others,’ explained Zaldivar. ‘Others claim to be global, but they’re really American, or they say they’re global but they’re really British. Our global DNA is quite unique.’

Meanwhile, the corporate finance practice held steady at 41%, global regulatory and intellectual property decreased from 31% to 30%, while disputes increased from 28% to 29%.

Notable mandates for the firm in 2024 included advising the Republic of Ghana on the restructuring of $13bn in outstanding Eurobond debt; acting for Walmart on its $2.3bn acquisition of VIZIO; successfully defending Vodafone in the long-running Phones4U competition law litigation; and advising BMW, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes Benz, Stellantis and Toyota on their joint venture to develop and operate a high-powered electric vehicle charging network across North America.

The firm also had its busiest year for global pro bono work, including securing a precedent-setting judgment in France’s Supreme Court for victims of human trafficking.

Zaldivar also said he believed the firm is well-placed to take advantage of shifts in the market caused by the Trump administration’s approach to government. ‘Some of our major clients in Europe and Asia are listening to the “America First” agenda and considering investing in America. We have a thousand lawyers in the US, in locations including Washington, New York, California, Texas, Florida, and Colorado, so I’m confident that the firm will play a vital role in the change happening in America.’

He also singled out London and a number of regions across the US as strategic priorities for the coming year.

‘We have critical mass and credibility in New York, but I would like to continue to add there. London remains the largest office, and we will continue to invest in growing London,’ he confirmed. ‘In the wider US, we will be opportunistic. We will look at Texas and California, and I always like additions in Washington.’

Zaldivar also highlighted the importance of the FRIS market – France, Italy and Spain – to the firm: ‘We combined the second, third, and fourth largest economies in Europe and decided to move upmarket to the very, very top.

‘We’ve done it in Paris – we’ve added high-end lawyers in capital markets, leveraged finance, private equity M&A and insolvency. We have done it in Italy. In Spain, we are number one in equity capital markets, but we can still add a little more.’

The firm was especially active in Italy last year, adding a 23-strong team of M&A finance lawyers from Orrick, a 13-strong team of restructuring and special situations lawyers from DLA Piper and a five-lawyer corporate and finance team from White & Case.

Last year, Hogan Lovells closed three offices in Johannesburg, Sydney and Warsaw. However, Zaldivar confirmed that there were no plans for further office closures or openings in 2025.

Simmons names international disputes head as new managing partner

Profile pic of Emily M

Simmons & Simmons has elected international head of disputes Emily Monastiriotis as the firm’s new managing partner, succeeding long-serving leader Jeremy Hoyland.

Monastiriotis, who will begin her four-year term on 1 May, joined Simmons as a partner in 2017, following previous stints at Mayer Brown and legacy Bond Dickinson. A member of the firm’s international executive committee, she was appointed international head of disputes in 2022, having previously served as the firm’s UK dispute resolution head.

Hoyland, who is set to continue as a partner at the firm and relocate to the firm’s Rome office in a new Europe-focused role, told Legal Business during an interview earlier this year that he had been supporting Monastiriotis and the other four candidates who ran to succeed him for the last two or three years, ahead of one of them eventually assuming the role.

For more, see ‘You’re never done’ – Simmons’ Hoyland on finding the firm’s identity and what’s next

During his 14-year tenure at the helm of the firm, profit per equity partner increased by 140% from £445,000 to £1.08m in 2024,  while revenue increased 136% from £243m to £574m and profit increased from £56.8m to £203.8m.

Senior partner Julian Taylor hailed the appointment in a statement, saying: ‘Emily is a highly effective, forward-thinking and inspiring leader who will bring a wealth of experience to the role of managing partner.

The four partners who stood against Hoyland for the managing partner role were international head of financial markets Mahrie Webb, TMT head Alexander Brown, UK and international tax head Darren Oswick, all of who are London-based, as well as Paris-based healthcare and life sciences sector group head Alexandre Regniault.

Monastiriotis added: ‘It’s a privilege to have been elected to this role by the partnership. Simmons has a strong foundation of sector-led, international growth thanks to the remarkable leadership of Jeremy Hoyland. I look forward to building on this by meeting our strategic priorities and continuing to innovate to deliver premium work for our global clients.’

tom.cox@legalease.co.uk