Legal Business

‘It’s belt and braces stuff’: KWM silent as Barclays beefs up lending provisions following financial strain

legal-business-default

King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) has agreed to tightened security over borrowings from its prime lender Barclays Bank following a period of financial stress for the law firm.

New documents filed on Companies House show that KWM’s European and Middle East arm, which Legal Business revealed in July had extended its loan with Barclays by £5m to £25m, has signed a debenture with the bank with strict provisions attached.

The debenture was made on 27 July by KWM in favour of Barclays ‘as security for your liabilities to us’. The firm has refused to disclose whether the debenture replaces existing borrowings or comes as new debt.

As part of the arrangement, Barclays has been given security over KWM’s revenue stream. Typically, banks will have a covenant in place with law firms that specifies a minimum number of equity partners or that profit must be equal to a multiple of its debt, but not a provision giving it security of its revenue.

The document reads that ‘by executing this debenture you charge to us with full title guarantee with the payment or discharge of all secured sums’. This includes ‘all your securities…all your goodwill and uncalled share capital for the time being…all your intellectual property…all trade debts now or in the future owing to you.’

A mechanism has been put in place whereby the bank can move between a fixed or a floating charge, which means the debenture will apply to all revenue in the region even if performance improves.

It will also remain in force until all sums have been repaid. The document reads: ‘This debenture will remain a continuing security in our favour, regardless of any settlement of account or any other matter whatever, and shall be without prejudice and in addition to every other right, remedy or security which we may have now or in the future in respect of any of the assets for the payment of any secured sums.’

A negative pledge and other restrictions have been imposed, with the firm required to gain Barclays’ ‘prior written consent’ before it can ‘sell, assign, lease, license or sub-license, or grant any interest in, your intellectual property rights’. This means Barclays will have to give sign off should the firm wish to open a new office, alter its existing leases whether to expand or contract, or sub-let space.

Barclays has also included a provision whereby it can appoint an administrator if KWM fails to meet its obligations. The document reads: ‘At any time after we have demanded payment of any of the secured sums, or any step or proceeding has been taken for the appointment of an administrator, liquidator or provisional liquidator, or with a view to seeking a moratorium or a voluntary agreement, in respect of you, or if requested by you, we may appoint…any person or persons to be a receiver and manager of all of or any of the assets or an administrator or administrators; and this debenture shall in any of the such events become immediately enforceable.’

A finance director at a major law firm told Legal Business: ‘This really restricts what KWM can do without reference to the bank. It’s belt and braces stuff. I’ve never seen this at a law firm.’

KWM has already been hit by a stream of partner exits over the last 24 months and undertook a restructuring in March which saw 24 partners being asked to leave.

The debenture was signed on the day that the majority of the legacy SJ Berwin partnership agreed to stump up £14m following a cash call. The move, which doubled each equity partners’ capital contribution, meant that those at the bottom of the firm’s 20-60 points ladder paid in around £80,000 into the business, while those at the top of the equity injected £240,000 into the firm. The firm also asked salaried partners to supply £60,000 each into the business.

KWM is still without a managing partner in the region following the resignation of William Boss at the start of the year and again failed to pay profit distributions, despite moving from a quarterly to a monthly-based system, last month after paying its tax bill.

The agreement was signed by European and Middle East senior partner Stephen Kon and regional co-head of tax Gareth Amdor. KWM said in a statement to Legal Business: ‘The debenture is part of the funding arrangements of the firm.’

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

For more on King & Wood Mallesons, subscribers can read ‘Branded’ for an in-depth look at the firm.

Legal Business

Paying up: KWM partners vote to inject £14m of extra capital

legal-business-default

An overwhelming majority of King & Wood Mallesons‘ (KWM) European and Middle East partnership has voted in favour of recapitalising the firm, committing £14m in a cash call to put it on a firmer footing.

KWM said in a statement: ‘The recapitalisation is the third stage of the firm’s strategic plan to strengthen its EUME business. Firstly, with effect from 1 May 2016, the firm implemented a new organisational structure which streamlined 17 practice areas in to three divisions to better align its structure with its business strategy. Secondly, the EUME partnership was rationalised to focus on clients and practices where the firm excels and which are aligned to the firm’s regional and global strategy. Addressing the capital position of the firm in EUME is the final part of the plan.’

A partnership vote saw 98% of the firm’s European and Middle East business vote in favour of the move, which follows a period of financial strain that has seen KWM increase its loan with Barclays by £5m to £25m and repeated delays to partner payments. The latter resulted in the firm moving from a largely quarterly-based profit distributions model to a monthly system.

The vote followed a recapitalisation plan laid out by London funds veteran Michael Halford, with KWM’s partners asked to pay in an extra £4,000 per point they have on the firm’s remuneration ladder. The firm operates on a 20 to 60 points ladder, with each point assigned to partners currently worth around £14,000 in annual profit distributions, putting the firm’s top partners on around £840,000 before bonuses.

The move means those on the bottom of the ladder will pay around £80,000 into the business, while those at the top of the equity will inject £240,000 into the firm. This will double each partners’ total capital contribution to the business, from £4,000 per point currently to £8,000 per point. Legal Business understands that partners have been given the option of injecting the cash or allow the sum to be deducted from their share of past and future profits.

The firm also asked salaried partners to supply £60,000 each into the business. Salaried partners had never had to contribute capital before, and have not traditionally been assigned profit points or been allowed to vote in partnership decisions. It is unclear if this will change as a result of any capital contributions.

A former member of the firm’s executive committee told Legal Business: ‘The success of the cash call depends on what it is going to be spent on. Partners don’t want it sucked back out without any future improvement. I’d question if there are there processes around working capital so that the firm keeps financial discipline.’

While the request for capital contributions from salaried partners is not unusual in the London legal market, and KWM was something of an anomaly in not doing so following a crackdown on limited liability partnerships (LLPs) by the UK’s HM Revenue & Customs in 2014 that resulted in higher capital contributions for non-equity and fixed-share partners, the move comes at a time of instability following an exodus of big-billing partners.

A six-partner private equity team in Paris quit in April to launch Goodwin Procter in France. The team, which included KWM Paris managing partner Christophe Digoy and big-biller Maxence Bloch, are believed to have walked out with £8m worth of billings.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

Read more on KWM in the feature: ‘Branded – Inside the troubled takeover of SJ Berwin’

Legal Business

KWM asks partners for up to £240,000 in cash call to double capital contributions

legal-business-default

King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) has asked its European and Middle Eastern partners to pay in between £80,000 and £240,000 as part of a recapitalisation plan designed to shore up its strained finances.

In a plan laid out by London funds veteran Michael Halford, who headed a recapitalisation taskforce, KWM’s partners have been asked to pay in an extra £4,000 per point they have on the firm’s remuneration ladder. The firm operates on a 20 to 60 points ladder, with each point assigned to partners currently worth around £14,000 in annual profit distributions, putting the firm’s top partners on around £840,000 before bonuses.

The move means those on the bottom of the ladder will be asked to pay around £80,000 into the business, while those at the top of the equity will be asked to inject £240,000 into the firm. Legal Business understands this will double each partners’ total capital contribution to the business, from £4,000 per point currently to £8,000 per point.

The firm is also asking its salaried partners to supply £60,000 each into the business. Salaried partners have never had to contribute capital before, and have not traditionally been assigned profit points or been allowed to vote in partnership decisions. It is unclear if this will change as a result of any capital contributions. It is understood salaried partners have until 27 July to decide on the cash call. 

While the request for capital contributions from salaried partners is not unusual in the London legal market, and KWM was something of an anomaly in not doing so following a crackdown on limited liability partnerships (LLPs) by the UK’s HM Revenue & Customs in 2014 that resulted in higher capital contributions for non-equity and fixed-share partners, the move comes at a time of instability following a mass exodus of big-billing partners.

The cash call across KWM’s European and Middle East business, the legacy SJ Berwin practice, also follows frequent delays to quarterly profit distributions and a sharp increase to its loan facility with Barclays. Partners were told at a meeting in March that the revolving credit facility, which had been set to expire in July 2016, had been extended and increased by £5m to £25m.

One ex-KWM partner told Legal Business: ‘I’m glad I’ve left. But they don’t have any other choice, they’ve got to get working capital from somewhere. It’s just like putting more money into a company to keep it solvent and keep it trading. There’s really no other choice. People are leaving quicker than overheads are being dealt with so revenue is falling faster than they’re cutting costs so there was no option other than a cash call.’

The move is the latest measure introduced by management to strengthen the business following a partnership restructuring in March that resulted in 24 partners being asked to leave the firm. While the move was longed for by high performing partners, the move has failed to halt a damaging run of exits, with a six-partner private equity team in Paris quitting in April to launch Goodwin Procter in France. The team, which included KWM Paris managing partner Christophe Digoy and big-biller Maxence Bloch, are believed to have walked out with £8m worth of billings.

Another former KWM partner added: ‘I’m not surprised as they will have a big tax bill at the end of July and the firm’s always survived by deducting 40% of your monthly drawings and putting it in a “tax reserve” but is actually used as working capital. They’ve always relied on billing enough in the next year to have the cash available on the 31st July.’

A spokesperson for KWM declined to comment.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

Read more in: ‘Global 100: Branded – Inside the troubled takeover of SJ Berwin’

Legal Business

Whiteford becomes the latest to quit KWM after sealing move to Covington

legal-business-default

Competition litigator Elaine Whiteford has become the second London partner to quit King & Wood Mallesons‘ European practice for Covington & Burling in the past week.

Whiteford (pictured) leaves KWM just three and a half years after joining from Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP). She reunites with former KWM London litigation head Alex Leitch, who joined Covington at the start of 2015 in a reboot of the firm’s City disputes practice, and last week’s recruit Greg Lascelles.

Her exit comes as a blow to KWM’s leadership, which has been working hard to halt a damaging run of partner exits in 2016, with the biggest damage coming in April when a six-partner private equity team in Paris switched to Goodwin Procter. The exits have coincided with, but are not part of, a partnership restructuring that saw 24 partners in Europe and the Middle East asked to leave in March.

Whiteford’s departure also coincides with Norton Rose Fulbright announcing today (18 July) it has hired disputes partner Paul Stothard from KWM. Stothard’s practice is based in London and Dubai.

Having started her career in Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s renowned City competition team in 2000, Whiteford left 11 years later to make partner at BLP. Her practice is based around advising corporates on investigations by the European Commission and UK competition authorities, and ‘follow on’ litigation in the English courts. One of her biggest cases at KWM saw her advise Luton Airport in a bus concessions dispute that stands as one of the few abuse of dominance cases to go to trial in England.

Whiteford becomes Covington’s third major competition hire in Europe this year, following the arrival of Kevin Coates, who headed a cartel unit at the European Commission, and Sophie Bertin, a former state aid official at DG Comp, in Brussels.

Leitch said: ‘She brings a wealth of EU litigation experience, which we see as a real asset in the current market, impacted by many developments around Europe, including Brexit related disputes, and the new class action regime in the United Kingdom.’

Law firms in the City have been gearing up for a slew of competition-based disputes following the introduction of US-style class actions in the UK late last year in the Consumer Rights Act 2015. US litigation firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan announced earlier this month it is bringing a £19bn claim against MasterCard on behalf of UK consumers hit with ‘illegal’ credit and debit card charges in one of the first claims of its kind.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

Read more in the feature: ‘Branded – Inside the troubled takeover of SJ Berwin’

Legal Business

‘An important step’: K&L Gates launches in Munich through King & Wood hires

legal-business-default

K&L Gates has opened its third German office by launching in Munich, with a three-lawyer hire from King & Wood Mallesons (KWM).

Munich becomes the firm’s 46th office and expands K&L Gates’ German footprint, where the firm also practices in Berlin and Frankfurt.

KWM investment management partner Hilger von Livonius will launch the office, bringing with him counsel Philipp Riedl and Michael Harris. The hires follow the arrival of fellow investment management partner Till Fock from KWM in Berlin in 2014.

Von Livonius concentrates his practice in the areas of banking, capital markets, asset management, and regulatory matters with a particular focus on investment funds and structured products.

K&L Gates German head Rüdiger von Hülst said: ‘With the addition of his highly skilled team, we take an important step in the continued expansion of both of our German and broader European investment management practices.’

The eleventh new partner or of counsel addition to K&L Gates’ growing investment management practice worldwide in the past 12 months, von Livonius’ arrival bolsters a key investment area for the US firm. Von Livonius commented: ‘We are pleased to have found a firm which provides us an excellent platform for future growth in the areas of structured products, investment funds, and derivatives. K&L Gates allows us to work as part of a large investment management team with a strong focus on the United States.’

Marking K&L Gates’ eighth office in Europe, the firm plans to add corporate, IT and IP litigation capability in the Bavarian capital. ‘Munich is a remarkable city and one of Germany’s most influential commercial centers, an outstanding location for further growth, and an ideal complement to our K&L Gates offices in Germany,’ added von Hülst.

Since K&L Gates entered the German market in early 2007 with the launch of its Berlin office, followed two years later with the addition of a Frankfurt office, the firm has built a 70-lawyer German practice.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

Legal Business

Securities litigator Lascelles latest to exit King & Wood Mallesons

legal-business-default

Struggling to plug a stream of exits, litigator Greg Lascelles has become the latest partner to depart King & Wood Mallesons and is set to join Covington & Burling in July.

Lascelles leaves KWM after 15 years at the firm, having qualified at legacy SJ Berwin in 2003 before making partner in 2011. He reunites with Alex Leitch, who left his post as KWM’s City litigation head in March 2015 to lead Covington’s push to improve its London disputes capability.

Lascelles has a broad litigation and arbitration practice, acting mainly for hedge funds, private equity houses, asset managers and investment banks in financial services disputes. He also has experience advising on regulatory investigations.

Leitch, co-chair of Covington’s European dispute resolution practice, said: ‘Financial services remains an active sector that attracts a lot of demand from our clients across a variety of disciplines, including antitrust litigation, commercial litigation and regulatory disputes.’

Lascelles’ exit comes at a bad time for the Asian legal giant as it seeks to steady its European business following a string of high-profile exits. Just last week the firm confirmed former Europe head of finance Jeremy Cross is set to join Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft.

The firm is currently mulling a cash call for its European and Middle East business, with partners informed at the firm’s monthly partners meeting in June that London-based funds veteran Michael Halford is leading a review of the firm’s capitalisation in the region. That came just three months after partners were told that the firm increased its loan facility with Barclays by £5m to £25m.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

Read more in the feature: ‘Branded – Inside the troubled takeover of SJ Berwin’

Legal Business

Comment: How KWM became Rogers & Wells II but with less staying power

legal-business-default

A fêted global giant acquires a punchy mid-tier player to provide coverage in a key global region. Hopes are high. Yet just a few years later the combined firm is plagued by culture clashes, an identity crisis and damaging departures. Buyer’s remorse sets in and the ‘acquired’ firm longs for freedom or even just the good old days.

As we report this month in our cover feature on King & Wood Mallesons (KWM), the painful reality is that SJ Berwin has become, for the global legal market, the modern equivalent of Rogers & Wells, the troubled US acquisition that halted Clifford Chance (CC)’s once unstoppable momentum.

The Rogers & Wells saga was a defining moment for the legal profession not once but twice. First, the 1999 deal embodied the rise of the global law firm… only to subsequently highlight the model’s limitations.

When SJ Berwin agreed its tie-up with KWM in 2013, a union with the strongest legal brands in China and Australia at the height of the gold rush into Asia’s legal market, it seemed a good deal for a London firm that was struggling to find its way in the global market but still had many assets.

As with Rogers & Wells, the problem is less that SJ Berwin was not a good firm, more that yawing gaps in culture and business model were downplayed when the deal was brokered. If you go into such matters with open eyes, the chances of managing the challenges are much improved. Belatedly realising you bought a dog at the cat show is quite different.

The legacy SJ Berwin had one of the most idiosyncratic and driven partnerships in the City. It was not always pretty, but it worked, and many partners felt a real attachment.

Ditch the brand, shake up the strategy and make it a lot easier for partners to leave – the result has been a highly damaging string of departures with clients following partners out the door. These losses culminated this year in the exodus of a productive Paris deal team that will cost KWM at least £8m in annual billings.

The exits have been so devastating that KWM’s biggest achievement in Europe has been to keep its well-regarded funds team, which has always operated in a self-contained bubble, relatively intact. Ominously finances are strained, aggravated by considerable debts. But the most worrying point for KWM is that its European practice appears to have lost much of its fight.

For this state of affairs, successive management teams have some awkward questions to answer. The firm has been continually behind the curve on key issues of costs, performance and operational polish. The sideshow of William Boss’s appointment, nine-month run as European managing partner and delay in naming a replacement has further undermined confidence. That lack of grip has contributed to the growing exasperation at the firm’s Chinese and Australian partnerships.

The key contrast with Rogers & Wells, of course, is that CC had underwritten its US operation. The verein structure of KWM offers no such support for SJ Berwin. A neutral observer would have to question if KWM is reaching the point at which the Asia-Pacific business must choose to more materially support and oversee its European arm, or step away.

Because the time for half measures is past. KWM in Europe simply cannot continue to drift as CC did and remain a credible player. As such, robust leadership figures are needed now. If, as some believe, William Naunton is the best man to lead in Europe, KWM should just get on and appoint him rather than worrying about who is Berwin man and boy. Now it is time to park the regrets and move on. The legacy SJ Berwin is dying as an institution and culture. And it needs to if something is to be built in its place.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

For more on King & Wood Mallesons, subscribers can see ‘Branded’ for an in-depth look at the firm.

Legal Business

KWM mulls cash call after increasing Barclays facility to £25m

legal-business-default

King & Wood Mallesons‘ (KWM) European and Middle East business is mulling a cash call months after increasing its loan facility with Barclays from £20m to £25m, as the firm strives to recover from a torrid 18 months.

EUME partners at the 2,200-lawyer firm were informed at their monthly partners meeting in June that London-based funds veteran Michael Halford is leading a review of the firm’s capitalisation in the region. One likely option is asking partners to contribute more capital as the firm moves to put its finances on a firmer footing.

Separately, the EUME business, which KWM acquired when the Asia-Pacific giant merged with SJ Berwin in November 2013, has increased its loan facility with Barclays by £5m to £25m. While the terms of the debt are not public, partners were told at a meeting in March that the revolving credit facility, which had been set to expire in July 2016, had been extended and increased.

The review of capitalisation comes after delays last year on profit distributions. The firm has since decided to move from quarterly distributions to monthly payments. Stuart Fuller (pictured), KWM’s global managing partner, told Legal Business: ‘We should run a business where we pay partners regularly. Quarterly payments are a quaint feature of UK firms.’

The move to address finances comes amid a challenging period for KWM in Europe. The firm has been struggled following a series of high-profile partner exits in the last 12 months and carried out a partnership restructuring that saw 24 partners asked to leave in March. EUME was last year the worst performing member of KWM, which operates a Swiss verein model that keeps liability and finances separate, as global revenue fell 1% to $1.02bn (KWM posted revenue growth estimated at 8% but its results are depressed in conversion to the strong dollar). While not directly comparable given the overlap in reporting periods, KWM’s EUME business generated £181.3m in revenue during the 2015 calendar year compared to £191m in 2014/15.

Just weeks after the partner restructuring was announced, a six-partner private equity team in Paris resigned for US law firm Goodwin Procter in a severe blow for KWM. The Paris team, which included Paris managing partner Christophe Digoy and big-biller Maxence Bloch, is understood to have walked out with at least £8m in annual billings. KWM has lost a number of other partners with substantial billings in the last two years.

KWM has confirmed that it has ‘written to Goodwin Procter in connection with legal proceedings by KWM against it’, rather than the Paris partners, but refused to confirm details of any possible action.

KWM has pledged to re-build its practice in France, highlighting that its profitable Paris funds team was unaffected by the Goodwin departures. Nevertheless, KWM has some way to go to demonstrate that it has steadied its course in Europe.

tom.moore@legalease.co.uk

For more on King & Wood Mallesons, subscribers can see ‘Branded’ for an in-depth look at the firm.

Legal Business

Global 100: Branded – Inside the troubled takeover of SJ Berwin

legal-business-default

Since merging with King & Wood Mallesons, legacy SJ Berwin has lurched from one disaster to the next. Can the firm recover?

A dire 2015 brought matters to a head at the firm now known as King & Wood Mallesons (KWM). On a wet and windy evening on 22 March, 24 partners from legacy SJ Berwin were hauled in front of global managing partner Stuart Fuller and European and Middle East senior partner Stephen Kon to be told that they were to depart.

Legal Business

KWM becomes Rogers & Wells II but with less staying power

legal-business-default

A fêted global giant acquires a punchy mid-tier player to provide coverage in a key global region. Hopes are high. Yet just a few years later the combined firm is plagued by culture clashes, an identity crisis and damaging departures. Buyer’s remorse sets in and the ‘acquired’ firm longs for freedom or even just the good old days.

As we report this month in our cover feature on King & Wood Mallesons (KWM), the painful reality is that SJ Berwin has become, for the global legal market, the modern equivalent of Rogers & Wells, the troubled US acquisition that halted Clifford Chance (CC)’s once unstoppable momentum.