Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC

Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC

I didn’t really decide to be a lawyer, the law chose me. I went to a wedding and sat next to a very nice man. He turned out to be a partner in a law firm and we talked career options all night. He gave me his business card and said to call him. I did, and was invited to meet some people. Entirely unbeknownst to me, it was a trainee selection day. I had no idea what I was doing, but I spent a day taking part in various team and individual exercises. At the end of the day the senior partner handed me a brown envelope. I asked what it was and he said, ‘a training contract’. I had to phone a friend to ask what that was. I hadn’t done a day of study in the law, but they paid for me to go to law school. I found my calling and the rest is history. Thank you, Miles. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC”

Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit

Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit

I am the third generation in my family to have taken up law, following in the footsteps of my grandfather and father. My father was a partner at one of the top law firms in Mumbai and some of my best memories are of sitting in his office during school summer holidays, listening to him advising clients and watching with awe as they would listen. In my eyes no-one was smarter than my father, who clearly had the attention of every client. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit”

Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach

Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach

Stewarts on some recent developments in arbitration in the UK

Continue reading “Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach”

Navigating dispute resolution: Exploring expert determination mechanisms – Polish perspective

Navigating dispute resolution: Exploring expert determination mechanisms – Polish perspective

Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak on the increasing importance of dispute adjudication boards

In recent years, court proceedings in Poland have been taking increasingly longer. The natural answer to this is arbitration, but unfortunately, in business reality even arbitration turns out to be too long for the parties. Probably for this reason we observe seeking for dispute avoidance by incorporating different kinds of dispute-resolving mechanisms into contracts. Does it have a chance of working? Continue reading “Navigating dispute resolution: Exploring expert determination mechanisms – Polish perspective”