Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC

Posted on |
Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC

I didn’t really decide to be a lawyer, the law chose me. I went to a wedding and sat next to a very nice man. He turned out to be a partner in a law firm and we talked career options all night. He gave me his business card and said to call him. I did, and was invited to meet some people. Entirely unbeknownst to me, it was a trainee selection day. I had no idea what I was doing, but I spent a day taking part in various team and individual exercises. At the end of the day the senior partner handed me a brown envelope. I asked what it was and he said, ‘a training contract’. I had to phone a friend to ask what that was. I hadn’t done a day of study in the law, but they paid for me to go to law school. I found my calling and the rest is history. Thank you, Miles. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC”

Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit

Posted on |
Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit

I am the third generation in my family to have taken up law, following in the footsteps of my grandfather and father. My father was a partner at one of the top law firms in Mumbai and some of my best memories are of sitting in his office during school summer holidays, listening to him advising clients and watching with awe as they would listen. In my eyes no-one was smarter than my father, who clearly had the attention of every client. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit”

Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach

Posted on |
Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach

Stewarts on some recent developments in arbitration in the UK

Continue reading “Two themes in arbitration cases before the English courts: state parties and the nature and extent of the court’s pro-arbitration approach”